Teams

PD18/Anderson/FTC

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - PD · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-19vs PD18/Moody/PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoseph Protiva / Trent McKenzie vs Sean Flynn / Gary Geddings6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Bailey vs Sher Chhetri4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCedrick Timmons / Phillip Boyer vs James Williams / Josh Edington6-1, 6-4
2026-04-25vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Turner)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesJoseph Protiva / David Anderson vs Christopher Turner / Robert Stuckey5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Jacob Coward0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn McLeod / Trent McKenzie vs Allen Grantham / Arence Gowe3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTim Carter vs Thommy Caballero4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Cooper / Wade Watford vs Jeffery Beasley / Raghunandan Kandala0-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs PD18/Moody/PTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesTrent McKenzie / John McLeod vs Chris Moody / Julien Weinberg2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Dave Ginnow4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Anderson / Joseph Protiva vs Donald Brunk / Gary Geddings6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesHoChieh Huang vs Sher Chhetri4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bailey / Tim Carter vs Sean Flynn / Jim Cromwell6-4, 6-4
2026-03-21vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Turner)Won 32
L#1 DoublesJoseph Protiva / John McLeod vs Christopher Turner / Allen Grantham1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTim Carter vs Arence Gowe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Anderson / Trent McKenzie vs Robert Stuckey / Paul Wood2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Logan Henderson7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHoChieh Huang / Matthew Cooper vs Mark Ingram / Jacob Coward6-4, 6-3
2026-03-07vs PD18/Moody/PTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoseph Protiva / John McLeod vs Chris Moody / Rodney Barr II6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Sher Chhetri6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrent McKenzie / David Anderson vs Sean Flynn / Tom Sliker6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTim Carter vs Julien Weinberg6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bailey / Phillip Boyer vs Jim Cromwell / Donald Brunk3-6, 4-6
2026-02-28vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Turner)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn McLeod / Joseph Protiva vs Jacob Coward / Todd Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Christopher Turner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrent McKenzie / Tim Carter vs Robert Stuckey / Jeffery Beasley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHoChieh Huang / Andrew Bailey vs Allen Grantham / Christopher Johnson4-6, 4-6
2026-02-12vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Turner)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid Anderson / John McLeod vs Jacob Coward / Todd Johnson4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Protiva vs Christopher Turner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHoChieh Huang / Trent McKenzie vs Allen Grantham / Arence Gowe1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTim Carter vs Robert Stuckey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bailey / Phillip Boyer vs Mark Ingram / Jeffery Beasley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-07vs PD18/Moody/PTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesDavid Anderson / Joseph Protiva vs Chris Moody / Tom Sliker4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCedrick Timmons vs Dave Ginnow6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHoChieh Huang / John McLeod vs Julien Weinberg / Sean Flynn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTim Carter vs Sher Chhetri6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTrent McKenzie / Andrew Bailey vs James Williams / Josh Edington7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Tim Carter
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.83
Joseph Protiva
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.83
Phillip Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Cedrick Timmons
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.80
Trent McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
John McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.73
HoChieh Huang
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.35
Andrew Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Wade Watford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Protiva + John McLeod123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Carter
17W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Joseph Protiva
10W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Phillip Boyer
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cedrick Timmons
6W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Trent McKenzie
4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
John McLeod
4W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
HoChieh Huang
6W–13L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Andrew Bailey
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Wade Watford
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.