Teams

CSRC EVANS

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-24vs LTFCS WELCHLost 14
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / George Vazquez vs Frederick Thurman / Reinhold Wigand6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Wooten vs Michael Rowley2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLuis Baars / Sam Wassink vs Angelito Sarmiento / Stephen Fillo3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesEvan Evans vs Chad Houchin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Riley / Peter de Waal vs John Wei / David Wright2-6, 1-6
2023-05-17vs FHCS AUTHORWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Frederic Gibbs vs Joe Bulow / Leo Navarro6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDavid Wooten vs Jay White2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSam Wassink / Steven Rubin vs Kenneth Murphy / Ryan Schultz6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesGeorge Vazquez vs Brian Priest6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLuis Baars / Peter de Waal vs Richard Powell / Charles Sides6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-10vs CSRC CAMPOSLost 14
L#1 DoublesLuis Baars / George Vazquez vs Leonard Green / Kenneth Thornton1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEvan Evans vs Zach Barker0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSam Wassink / Frederic Gibbs vs Mihai Fecioru / Lloyd Seeley7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSteven Rubin vs Dan Campos2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter de Waal / Richard Riley vs Jason Gonzales / Brandon Scott7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-03vs MEMPK LORENZLost 13
W#1 DoublesSam Wassink / Frederic Gibbs vs Steve Gustafson / Jeff Thomas7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSteven Rubin vs Charles Autry1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Riley / Luis Baars vs Dan Ramsey / Clayton Zenner2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEvan Evans vs Adrian Hill0-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs FLYHS GRAFLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Frederic Gibbs vs Clark Olander / Kevin Wright6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Wooten vs Ryan Saxby6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Rubin / Richard Riley vs David Leeper / Peter Viliesis3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEvan Evans vs George Graf3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSam Wassink / George Vazquez vs Bill Graziano / Todd Kannegieter6-2, 6-1
2023-04-19vs CCW THEURERWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Frederic Gibbs vs Jay Littleford / Eric Powers6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Wooten vs George Cespedes2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGeorge Vazquez / Steven Rubin vs Kyle Harmande / Joseph Staltare6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEvan Evans vs Chad Davis2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Riley / Peter de Waal vs Roger Meurer / Rick Jordan2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Frederic Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Michael Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Steven Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.88
David Wooten
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.81
George Vazquez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Luis Baars
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Richard Riley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.34
Evan Evans
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Peter de Waal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Wassink
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Wassink + Michael Reynolds5072% games+14.3% vs expected
Richard Riley + Evan Evans1541% games+2.2% vs expected
Michael Reynolds + Frederic Gibbs5358% games+1.6% vs expected
Richard Riley + Peter de Waal4744% games−2.4% vs expected
George Vazquez + Steven Rubin2346% games−7.7% vs expected
Richard Riley + Steven Rubin1434% games−21.6% vs expected
Richard Riley + Luis Baars044 matchesnot enough data
Evan Evans + Steven Rubin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Frederic Gibbs
8W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Reynolds
75W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Steven Rubin
19W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
David Wooten
29W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
George Vazquez
14W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
Luis Baars
24W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Richard Riley
21W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.50
2.5
Evan Evans
8W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.34
Peter de Waal
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sam Wassink
25W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.