Teams

CSRC CAMPOS

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs CCW THEURERWon 20
W#1 SinglesDan Campos vs Robert Williamson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZach Barker / Lloyd Seeley vs William Theurer / Chad Davis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-24vs MEMPK LORENZWon 20
W#1 SinglesZach Barker vs Charles Autry6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesDan Campos vs Thomas Holton6-0, 6-0
2023-05-17vs FLYHS GRAFWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Campos / Zach Barker vs David Leeper / Peter Viliesis6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-10vs CSRC EVANSWon 20
W#1 SinglesZach Barker vs Evan Evans6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDan Campos vs Steven Rubin6-2, 6-1
2023-04-26vs LTFCS WELCHSplit 11
W#1 DoublesZach Barker / Lloyd Seeley vs Frederick Thurman / John Wei1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDan Campos vs Michael Rowley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-19vs FHCS AUTHORLost 01
L#1 SinglesZach Barker vs Brian Priest6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kenneth Thornton
published
3.33
Zach Barker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Dan Campos
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Jason Gonzales
published
2.86
Troy Limmer
published
2.83
Leonard Green
published
2.49
Tom Brokaw
published
Lloyd Seeley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Barker + Dan Campos5456% games+3.7% vs expected
Jason Gonzales + Leonard Green314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Gonzales + Zach Barker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Thornton
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Zach Barker
114W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Dan Campos
99W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Jason Gonzales
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Troy Limmer
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
Leonard Green
33W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Tom Brokaw
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Lloyd Seeley
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.