Teams

Northwood 2.5

2026 Adult 18&Over-PB · Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-27vs LCC-MathewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllyson Brette Harman / Mary Gilmore vs Lauren Alise Gilbert / Amanda Mathews6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNatalie Mcmullen vs Lauren Bynum6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Lee Joyner / Nancy Walton vs Claire Thames / Katie Hinton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-26vs Walley-SP-18's- 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesKerry Parker / Juliet Mcdonald vs Bayley Alexander / Emily Walker6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Mcmullen / Meredith Hope Daugherty vs Sarah Ard / Kim Blackwell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJuliet Mcdonald / Amanda Snowden vs Amanda Hanson / Sarah Queck6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKerry Parker / Nancy Walton vs Lauren Draughn / Mary Kathryn Burge6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-06vs Walley-SP-18's- 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Lee Joyner / Nancy Walton vs Kim Blackwell / Emily Walker2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Hope Daugherty / Amanda Blackledge vs Haley Walley / Haden Walters4-6, 2-6
2026-03-29vs Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKerry Parker / Natalie Mcmullen vs Hannah Taninbaum / Amanda Williamson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllyson Brette Harman / Mary Gilmore vs Lauren Draughn / Lauren McWilliams6-1, 6-1
2026-03-23vs LCC-MathewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Gilmore / Allyson Brette Harman vs Leighann Stevens / Emily Saxton6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNancy Walton vs Claire Thames6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Blackledge / Cathy Lee Joyner vs Katie Hinton / Samantha Andrus4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Natalie Mcmullen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Kerry Parker
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.38
Juliet Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Mary Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Allyson Brette Harman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Amanda Blackledge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Amanda Snowden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.17
Nancy Walton
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.06
Cathy Lee Joyner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.06
Meredith Hope Daugherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Parker + Juliet Mcdonald6069% games+17.5% vs expected
Nancy Walton + Cathy Lee Joyner123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gilmore + Allyson Brette Harman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Mcmullen
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Kerry Parker
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Juliet Mcdonald
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Mary Gilmore
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Allyson Brette Harman
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Amanda Blackledge
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Snowden
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Nancy Walton
7W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Cathy Lee Joyner
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Meredith Hope Daugherty
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.