Teams

Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5

2026 Adult 18&Over-PB · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-28vs canebrake tennis 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Hannah Taninbaum vs Mary Catherine Quinn / Wilhelmina Jarvis6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmeze Shemper vs Kayla Holcomb7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren Draughn / Lauren McWilliams vs Lona Booth / Aimee Cotton2-6, 4-6
2026-04-20vs LCC-MathewsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Queck / Mary Kathryn Burge vs Lauren Bynum / Samantha Andrus6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMing Morris vs Leighann Stevens6-1, 6-1
2026-04-13vs Walley-SP-18's- 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Williamson / Lauren McWilliams vs Bayley Alexander / Emily Walker1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHannah Taninbaum vs Sarah Ard6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMing Morris / Morgan Smith vs Stephanie McMullan / Sarah Sumrall1-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs Northwood 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Sarah Queck vs Juliet Mcdonald / Amanda Snowden1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Draughn / Mary Kathryn Burge vs Kerry Parker / Nancy Walton0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-30vs canebrake tennis 2.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Queck / Ameze Shemper vs Morgan Dunaway / Wilhelmina Jarvis6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Burge vs Kayla Holcomb3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Smith / Lauren McWilliams vs Aimee Cotton / Mary Catherine Quinn0-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs Northwood 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Taninbaum / Amanda Williamson vs Kerry Parker / Natalie Mcmullen3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Draughn / Lauren McWilliams vs Allyson Brette Harman / Mary Gilmore1-6, 1-6
2026-03-24vs Walley-SP-18's- 2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Amanda Williamson vs Kim Blackwell / Sarah Ard6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmeze Shemper vs Holly Alexander6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren Draughn / Hannah Taninbaum vs Haley Walley / Haden Walters1-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs LCC-MathewsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Hanson vs Katie Hinton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Queck / Mary Kathryn Burge vs Lauren Bynum / Julie Shows6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Ameze Shemper
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Ming Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.38
Amanda Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.37
Sarah Queck
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Mary Kathryn Burge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.10
Lauren McWilliams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.99
Hannah Taninbaum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.90
Lauren Draughn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Queck + Hannah Taninbaum314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ameze Shemper
10W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Ming Morris
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Amanda Hanson
12W–5L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Sarah Queck
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Mary Kathryn Burge
9W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Lauren McWilliams
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Hannah Taninbaum
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Lauren Draughn
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.