Teams

Q-Petersen/18/7.5/WCD/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-09vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Stratton / Stephanie Knox vs Caroline Marston / Rachel Morgan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen White / Catherine Reed vs Laura Gooszen / Stephanie Bass6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTrisha Q-Petersen / Megan Stuermann vs Ashley Farr / Laura Frierson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Pharr/18/7.5/WCD/BTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Stratton / Louise Sistrunk vs Lacey McCollum / Nicole Mazur7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Couvillon / Trisha Q-Petersen vs Sandra Botzong / Gina Robinson6-4, 7-6
2025-09-18vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen White / Catherine Reed vs Ashley Farr / Kyla Fulco6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Couvillon / Pam O'Brien vs Rachel Morgan / Ashley Turner6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Lewis / Megan Stuermann vs Laura Frierson / Margaret Gifford2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-11vs Pharr/18/7.5/WCD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Jenkins / Louise Sistrunk vs Jeanna Choi / Sapna Tank6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeslie Stewart / Jorie OBrien vs Pat Masters / Nong Boutaloth7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelly Stratton / Stephanie Knox vs Kirita Windham / Deborah Hollis6-1, 6-2
2025-08-28vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Stratton / Pam O'Brien vs Rachel Morgan / Margaret Gifford6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGrace Rogers / Leigh Flood vs Ashley Farr / Sara Doughty6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTrisha Q-Petersen / Leigh Ann Couvillon vs Laura Gooszen / Carrie Rainey7-5, 6-1
2025-08-21vs Pharr/18/7.5/WCD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Singletary / Anne Jenkins vs Sapna Tank / Jeanna Choi6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Valiulis / Catherine Reed vs Sandra Botzong / Patricia Hurst6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmber Lewis / Jorie OBrien vs Lacey McCollum / Meredith Gore6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Anne Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Grace Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Jorie OBrien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Kelly Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Leigh Ann Couvillon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Indira Sartin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Amber Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Catherine Reed
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Leigh Flood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Laura Singletary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Stephanie Knox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Megan Stuermann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Louise Sistrunk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Trisha Q-Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Campbell
published
Pam O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shelly Valiulis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Lewis + Megan Stuermann4149% gamesnot enough data
Grace Rogers + Jorie OBrien314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Knox + Kelly Stratton314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Reed + Laura Singletary213 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Ann Couvillon + Megan Campbell303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stratton + Megan Campbell213 matchesnot enough data
Pam O'Brien + Shelly Valiulis213 matchesnot enough data
Trisha Q-Petersen + Megan Stuermann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Jenkins
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.92
Grace Rogers
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jorie OBrien
20W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Kelly Stratton
56W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Leigh Ann Couvillon
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Indira Sartin
27W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Amber Lewis
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Catherine Reed
50W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.48
Leigh Flood
35W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Laura Singletary
34W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Stephanie Knox
58W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Megan Stuermann
28W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Louise Sistrunk
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Trisha Q-Petersen
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Megan Campbell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam O'Brien
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Valiulis
27W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.