Teams

Pharr/18/7.5/WCD/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-16vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Mazur / Pat Masters vs Laura Frierson / Ashley Farr1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrichel Binderim / Jeanna Choi vs Kyla Fulco / Laura Gooszen6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Q-Petersen/18/7.5/WCD/POTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLacey McCollum / Nicole Mazur vs Kelly Stratton / Louise Sistrunk5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Botzong / Gina Robinson vs Leigh Ann Couvillon / Trisha Q-Petersen4-6, 6-7
2025-09-25vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Hollis / Kirita Windham vs Margaret Gifford / Ashley Farr4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanna Choi / Nong Boutaloth vs Laura Gooszen / Kyla Fulco6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNicole Mazur / Lacey McCollum vs Rachel Morgan / Laura Frierson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-11vs Q-Petersen/18/7.5/WCD/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanna Choi / Sapna Tank vs Anne Jenkins / Louise Sistrunk3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPat Masters / Nong Boutaloth vs Leslie Stewart / Jorie OBrien6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKirita Windham / Deborah Hollis vs Kelly Stratton / Stephanie Knox1-6, 2-6
2025-09-04vs Doughty-Gifford/18/7.5/WCD/STCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPat Masters / Nong Boutaloth vs Margaret Gifford / Stephanie Bass6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKirita Windham / Trichel Binderim vs Sara Doughty / Laurie Oliphint6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGina Robinson / Jeanna Choi vs Kyla Fulco / Rachel Morgan5-7, 4-6
2025-08-21vs Q-Petersen/18/7.5/WCD/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSapna Tank / Jeanna Choi vs Laura Singletary / Anne Jenkins1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandra Botzong / Patricia Hurst vs Shelly Valiulis / Catherine Reed3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLacey McCollum / Meredith Gore vs Amber Lewis / Jorie OBrien3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Carol Matthews
published 4
3.68
Jeanna Choi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Pat Masters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Kirita Windham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Sandra Botzong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lacey McCollum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Karen Pharr
published
3.47
Amy Bowman
published 4
3.46
Sapna Tank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Debra Richardson
published 4
3.44
Meredith Gore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Nong Boutaloth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Trichel Binderim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Patricia Hurst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Deborah Hollis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Gina Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Nicole Mazur
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nong Boutaloth + Jeanna Choi6156% games+6.7% vs expected
Sandra Botzong + Lacey McCollum3352% games−3.0% vs expected
Sapna Tank + Jeanna Choi3350% games−6.7% vs expected
Trichel Binderim + Meredith Gore2351% games−10.2% vs expected
Kirita Windham + Lacey McCollum4253% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Mazur + Meredith Gore2346% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Botzong + Pat Masters404 matchesnot enough data
Lacey McCollum + Meredith Gore224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Matthews
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jeanna Choi
28W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Pat Masters
24W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Kirita Windham
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sandra Botzong
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lacey McCollum
29W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Karen Pharr
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Amy Bowman
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Sapna Tank
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
4
Debra Richardson
21W–23L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Meredith Gore
33W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Nong Boutaloth
43W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Trichel Binderim
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Patricia Hurst
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Deborah Hollis
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Gina Robinson
30W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Nicole Mazur
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.