Teams

CACM NAVY

2026 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

15 players · average NTRP 4.21 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs CP ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Shappell / Daniel Steinhauser vs McCall Board / Nam Luu5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCydney Springer / Ali Barghelame vs Melissa Louie / Albert Lin5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Springer / Alessio Ferro vs John Kelleher / Claire Collins6-4, 6-2
2026-08-09vs WP-O GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesNATALIE KOONTZ / Chad Picard vs Mallory Groth / Jordan Wagner6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDirk McDermott / Sasha Parker vs Caitlin Barron / Tyler Fairbairn6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Steinhauser / Angie Shappell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-02vs GPTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesSasha Parker / Mustafa Neemuchwala vs Gavin Collyott / Mikennah Schwing0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLissa Moon / Chad Picard vs Claire Ehrlich / Miles Lee6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / Emily Mone vs Maverick Helmer / Kristen Remeza7-6, 7-5
2026-07-26vs DPR-EP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMustafa Neemuchwala / Emily Mone vs Rachel Heise / Hervey Pierre6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Springer / Alessio Ferro vs GABRIEL MONTOYA / Tonya Laden6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCydney Springer / Keith Martinez vs Carlie Odau / Joe Hendricks2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-19vs DPR-RP GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesLissa Moon / Chad Picard vs Bram Schalken / Krysta Szeto6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngie Shappell / Daniel Steinhauser vs Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Heather Leong Hulstein7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Springer / Brendan Kelleher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-12vs APR-E REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesChad Picard / NATALIE KOONTZ vs Sanjana Chintalapudi / Armando Escalante6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDirk McDermott / Cydney Springer vs Aaron Weil / Jennifer Garbiso Hall6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Alessio Ferro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Cydney Springer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Mone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Chad Picard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Daniel Steinhauser
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Sasha Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Mustafa Neemuchwala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
NATALIE KOONTZ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Dirk McDermott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Angie Shappell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Lissa Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Ali Barghelame
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Amy Springer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Brendan Kelleher
published 3.5
Keith Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lissa Moon + Chad Picard6455% games+3.2% vs expected
Mustafa Neemuchwala + Lissa Moon10358% games+0.2% vs expected
Cydney Springer + Ali Barghelame5252% games−5.0% vs expected
Cydney Springer + Chad Picard404 matchesnot enough data
Cydney Springer + Dirk McDermott303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Springer + Dirk McDermott213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Springer + Chad Picard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alessio Ferro
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
4.44
4.5
Cydney Springer
50W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Emily Mone
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Chad Picard
85W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Steinhauser
4W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Sasha Parker
60W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
Mustafa Neemuchwala
60W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
NATALIE KOONTZ
63W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Dirk McDermott
150W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Angie Shappell
115W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
Lissa Moon
109W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ali Barghelame
57W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amy Springer
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Brendan Kelleher
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Keith Martinez
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.