Teams

WP-O GOLD

2026 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-23vs APR-E REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Barron / Caitlin Barron vs Michelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji1-6, 2-6
2026-08-16vs CP ORANGELost 02
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Barron / Tyler Fairbairn vs Albert Lin / Justine Barone2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKim Ellis / Warren Lubchenco vs Rachel Frisz / Ark Wang6-7, 4-6
2026-08-09vs CACM NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMallory Groth / Jordan Wagner vs NATALIE KOONTZ / Chad Picard2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Barron / Tyler Fairbairn vs Dirk McDermott / Sasha Parker4-6, 0-6
2026-07-26vs GPTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Fairbairn / Emma Schilling vs Evgeny Babak / Jess Hadala4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrooks Savage / Morgan Bullen vs Claire Ehrlich / Miles Lee1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Barron / Caitlin Barron vs Joseph Herba / Lani Reichardt4-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs DPR-EP REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesWarren Lubchenco / Kim Ellis vs Laura Montoya / GABRIEL MONTOYA4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Wagner / Emma Schilling vs Oliver Montoya / KC Nettleton3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Barron / Mallory Groth vs Kendall Lin / Rachel Heise4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MIXED 8.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-LGT NAVY4110513117
2DPR-EP RED3210513119
3DPR-RP NAVY328719148
4APR-E RED226613114
5DPR-RP GREEN22571494
6SS-D YELLOW1451021158
7WP-O GOLD030918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Warren Lubchenco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Jordan Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Caitlin Barron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Gavin Berkey
published
3.70
John Barron
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Brooks Savage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Tyler Fairbairn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Mallory Groth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Emma Schilling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Morgan Bullen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Warren Lubchenco
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jordan Wagner
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Caitlin Barron
2W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Gavin Berkey
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
John Barron
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Brooks Savage
2W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Tyler Fairbairn
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.53
Mallory Groth
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Emma Schilling
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Morgan Bullen
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.