Teams

TYCC The In Crowd - P. Murtagh

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-04vs Fishhawk Fireballs - N. KippLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Stockstad / Mary Ann Dellegatto vs Sharon Lucas / Darla Jones6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-21vs HCC Overserved/DoyleLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Dellegatto / Sarah Stockstad vs Amanda Hammerli / Shann Laccabue4-6, 1-6
2021-10-14vs Tampa Palms - C. MarshallWon 10
W#3 DoublesJune Williams / Shalle VanHorn vs Hannah Gabora / Eileen de Perello7-6, 6-4
2021-09-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Dellegatto / Kelly Ruggles vs Teresa Armas / Mary Heysek7-6, 6-0
2021-09-23vs Palma Ceia Lady Pirates - S. AbbeyLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs Nicole Mulrooney0-6, 3-6
2021-09-16vs Arbor Green LOVAS - C. PaulWon 10
W#1 DoublesShalle VanHorn / Kathryn Thomas vs Silvia Srour / Lisa Strickland6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kristy Wilander
published
3.61
Jana Bridge
published
3.52
Amanda Rockwood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Tracy MacKechnie
published
3.23
Sarah Watkins
published
3.21
3.14
Mary Ann Dellegatto
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Shalle VanHorn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Monica la Puente
published
2.95
2.95
Tate Casper
published
2.87
Paige Murtagh
published
2.73
Ali Garrity
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann Dellegatto + Amanda Rockwood5457% games−0.8% vs expected
Mary Ann Dellegatto + Shalle VanHorn101746% games−5.1% vs expected
Sarah Watkins + Kristy Wilander134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Wilander
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jana Bridge
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Amanda Rockwood
103W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Tracy MacKechnie
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Sarah Watkins
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
3.5
Jacqueline Carricato
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Mary Ann Dellegatto
68W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Shalle VanHorn
54W–73L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Monica la Puente
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Christine Dietrich
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Tate Casper
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Paige Murtagh
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87
3
Ali Garrity
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.