Teams

Tampa Palms - C. Marshall

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-14vs TYCC The In Crowd - P. MurtaghLost 01
L#2 SinglesCarrie Bradley vs Christine Dietrich3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBonnie Miller / Ann Coston vs Helene Glucksman / Jeana Rago Blair6-1, 7-5
2021-09-30vs West Meadows 3.5 Day - B. BroschWon 10
W#3 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Carrie Bradley vs Louise Tedesco / Jian Sun6-3, 7-6
2021-09-16vs Fishhawk Fireballs - N. KippWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarrie Bradley vs Monica Eiermann6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Matura Suksai
published
3.46
Dora Rattes
published 3.5
3.34
Tibbie Farnsworth
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.30
Eileen de Perello
published 3.5
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Bitting
published
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
3.05
Bonnie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Kathy Elam
published
2.81
2.76
Karen Cachion
published
2.71
Hannah Gabora
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Carrie Bradley
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tibbie Farnsworth + Lisa Bitting8756% games−0.3% vs expected
Ann Coston + Bonnie Miller2546% gamesnot enough data
Tibbie Farnsworth + Tina Sturdevant314 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Bradley + Tina Sturdevant123 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Mays + Karen Cachion213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matura Suksai
40W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
3.5
Dora Rattes
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Tibbie Farnsworth
209W–139L career · 18 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Eileen de Perello
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Bitting
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Bonnie Miller
103W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kathy Elam
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christine Marshall
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 16 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Carrie Bradley
49W–58L career · 8 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.