Teams

Qteam

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-23vs Montana/Wilcox/55&Over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Lower / Elaine Scott vs Kathleen Bean / Nancy Bohyer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRuth Nelson / Mardi Robers vs Dawn Schwartz / Nancy Trangmoe1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Ford / Joan Johnston vs Nancy Larson / Becky Wilcox6-3, 6-4
2023-06-22vs Montana/Wilcox/55&Over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesCathy Lower / Elaine Scott vs Kathleen Bean / Dawn Schwartz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJuli McLain / Ruth Nelson vs Sheila Schaub / Becky Wilcox7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Ford / Mardi Robers vs Patrisha Crisp / Nancy Trangmoe5-7, 5-7
2023-06-21vs Montana/Wilcox/55&Over6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Nelson / Mardi Robers vs Nancy Bohyer / Sheila Schaub2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Ford / Cathy Lower vs Patrisha Crisp / Nancy Trangmoe3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.43
Cynthia Ford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cathy Lower
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elaine Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Joan Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Juli McLain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mardi Robers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ruth Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Scott + Cathy Lower3252% gamesnot enough data
Mardi Robers + Cynthia Ford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Ford
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Cathy Lower
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Elaine Scott
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joan Johnston
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Juli McLain
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mardi Robers
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Nelson
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.