Teams

LKHA-Haynes/CSD 18+ 4.5 Wed

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Men 4.5 Wednesday PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-14vs LAKI-King/CSDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJason Woodsby / Duane Johnson vs Ravi Mujumdar / Thomas Jeter4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJustin Akonful vs Corey Campbell6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharlie King / Zachary Tran vs DJ Karasik / Alex Kiser2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChet Kristy vs Andres Pazos3-6, 4-6
2025-04-30vs LPEA-Eakin/CSD SPARTANWon 31
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Keeney / Charlie King vs Carl Yerger / LUIS AYALA6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChet Kristy vs Pranav Chivukula2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesParker Powell / Steven Kayton vs Vaughn Schmutz / Eric Marcus3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesOtto Vejsada vs Paul Fackler6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5 Wednesday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Justin Akonful
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.49
Matt Hughes
published
4.47
Otto Vejsada
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.40
Steven Kayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Jason Woodsby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Chet Kristy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.30
Zachary Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Phil Payne
published
4.27
Benjamin Keeney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Charlie King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Daniel Shiflet
published 4.5
4.23
Duane Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Michael Dedmond
published
Parker Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chet Kristy + Benjamin Keeney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Akonful
18W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Matt Hughes
34W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
Otto Vejsada
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
4.47
Steven Kayton
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Jason Woodsby
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Chet Kristy
28W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Zachary Tran
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
4.30
Phil Payne
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Benjamin Keeney
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Charlie King
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Shiflet
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Duane Johnson
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Michael Dedmond
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
Parker Powell
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.