Teams

N OR-Agrawal

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Ying-Chieh Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Shweta Agrawal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.30
Amanda Yaris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Christine Charny vs Ella Mills / Vanessa Gebbie6-0, 6-0
2024-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesYing-Chieh Chen / Mai-Anh Nguyen vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver6-4, 6-2
2024-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Charny / Amanda Yaris vs Victoria Cartwright / Crystal Ounaphom6-2, 6-1
2024-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Ying-Chieh Chen vs Nina Church-Adams / Carmen Timberlake6-2, 6-0
2024-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Mai-Anh Nguyen vs Samantha Nakata / Paddy McShane6-0, 6-2
2024-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesYing-Chieh Chen / Amanda Yaris vs Elicia Putnam / Ashley Sajadi6-2, 6-0
2024-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Amanda Yaris vs Jody Yates / Natasha Brady6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Ying-Chieh Chen
45W–15L career
0%88%12%
3.44
3
Shweta Agrawal
94W–36L career
0%2%98%
3.35
3.5
Amanda Yaris
45W–21L career
0%99%1%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.