Teams

OLYMPIC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.59 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.04
Lisa Lohre
published
4.02
Valerie Pietrasz
published
3.82
3.66
Rachel Quon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Alex Ferrif
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Tricia Weaver-Moss
published
3.31
Elizabeth Griffiths
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Carlin
published
3.26
Blair Evans
published 3.5
Alyssa Lopes
published 3.5
3.19
Anna Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Shan Bai
published
3.15
Kasey Quon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Catherine Gouge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Bianca Dawydiak
published 3
2.64
Rachel Manson
published
2.60
Elizabeth Cooper
published 3
Julie Christy
published
Sherry LaPorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Quon + Rachel Quon3355% games+5.3% vs expected
Lisa Lohre + Caitlin Beatty9553% games+2.8% vs expected
Tricia Weaver-Moss + Lisa Carlin123 matchesnot enough data
Kasey Quon + Alex Ferrif213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Lisa Lohre
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Rachel Quon
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Alex Ferrif
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.64
4
Catherine Krabbenschmidt
11W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tricia Weaver-Moss
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Elizabeth Griffiths
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Lisa Carlin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Blair Evans
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Alyssa Lopes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anna Simmons
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Shan Bai
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Kasey Quon
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Catherine Gouge
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Bianca Dawydiak
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Rachel Manson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Elizabeth Cooper
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry LaPorte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.