Teams

TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Dee Lavender

23 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-27vs Peachtree Station (Claire Hatten)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesBarbara Barger / Nancy Merritt vs Kimberly Lindsey / Ethan Rabman2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKaren Peel vs Barbara Taylor6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Holtzclaw / Angela Pittman vs Heather Karwisch / Lisa Weaver1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStacy Campos vs Tavie Allan0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Armstrong / Cynthia Fitzhugh vs Claire Hatten / Cecilia Maguire6-4, 3-6, 7-5
2024-06-20vs Hudlow (Lisa Machitar)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesWendy Armstrong / Cynthia Fitzhugh vs Daniella McGowan / Jenifer Schellman0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Peel vs Sarah Cashwell1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGina Connell / Patricia Haywood vs Lisa MacHitar / Kristen Paulling6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesStacy Campos vs Stephanie Stieglitz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Pittman / Bridget Torregrosa vs Sherry Cross / Crystal Earwood2-6, 2-6
2024-06-17vs Peachtree Station (Claire Hatten)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesStacy Campos / Patricia Haywood vs Kimberly Lindsey / Lisa Weaver2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Peel vs Silvia Martin0-6, 6-2, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Fitzhugh / Meylin Gonzalez vs Connie Pope / Elket Swope1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesKarissa Ayala vs Victoria Eigen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Elliott / Joyce Larkins vs Claire Hatten / Tiki Bicknell0-6, 2-6
2024-06-13vs TPC Sugarloaf (Chris McCall)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesCynthia Fitzhugh / Judiah Shepherd vs Melani Chumley / Katy Southern1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Campos vs Sarah Longwell0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Elliott / Joyce Larkins vs Sandra Read / Meredith Hoffman-Carpenter1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Peel vs Amy Kirkus3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGina Connell / Barbara Barger vs Chris McCall / Malia Mixon7-6, 6-3
2024-05-30vs Hudlow (Lisa Machitar)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesNancy Merritt / Karen Peel vs Crystal Earwood / Karen Ruszkowski3-6, 6-3, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Campos vs Stephanie Stieglitz4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Morgan / Angela Pittman vs Sherry Cross / Debbie Ellis3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBarbara Barger vs Jenifer Schellman0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Elliott / Joyce Larkins vs Lisa MacHitar / Kristen Paulling1-6, 0-6
2024-05-16vs TPC Sugarloaf (Chris McCall)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesBarbara Barger / Gina Connell vs Melani Chumley / Chris McCall1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Campos vs Sarah Longwell2-6, 7-5, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Armstrong / Terri Schraudenbach vs Maria Migliore / Affie Covey5-7, 6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAlexandra Vujovich vs Sandra Read7-6
L#3 DoublesMeylin Gonzalez / Janet Mcpheely vs Amy Kirkus / Meredith Hoffman-Carpenter2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Dee Lavender
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
JIll Tereshinski
published 4
3.65
Hanh Struck
published 4
3.57
Stacy Campos
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.56
Judiah Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Terri Schraudenbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Barbara Barger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Patricia Haywood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Gina Connell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Peel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Alexandra Vujovich
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Merritt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Cynthia Fitzhugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Karissa Ayala
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Sandy Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Bridget Torregrosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Angela Pittman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Jackie Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Michele Collins
published
3.12
Wendy Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Anne Holtzclaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Joyce Larkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Mcpheely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meylin Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Haywood + Gina Connell4549% games+6.5% vs expected
Patricia Haywood + Karen Peel7456% games+5.9% vs expected
Patricia Haywood + Cynthia Fitzhugh7156% games+5.3% vs expected
Hanh Struck + Judiah Shepherd5355% games+5.2% vs expected
Sandy Elliott + Angela Pittman8162% games+4.7% vs expected
Terri Schraudenbach + Barbara Barger3251% games+3.6% vs expected
Hanh Struck + JIll Tereshinski4453% games+1.8% vs expected
Terri Schraudenbach + Gina Connell5153% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JIll Tereshinski
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Hanh Struck
83W–46L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Stacy Campos
40W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Judiah Shepherd
62W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Terri Schraudenbach
36W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Barbara Barger
36W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Patricia Haywood
64W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Gina Connell
26W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Karen Peel
52W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Alexandra Vujovich
31W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Merritt
49W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Fitzhugh
56W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Karissa Ayala
20W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Sandy Elliott
45W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Bridget Torregrosa
58W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Angela Pittman
49W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jackie Morgan
36W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Michele Collins
42W–40L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Wendy Armstrong
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anne Holtzclaw
33W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Joyce Larkins
34W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Janet Mcpheely
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meylin Gonzalez
34W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.