Teams

Cherokee Town & CC (Amber York)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Dee Lavender

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-27vs South Fulton (Vickie Ware)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesTara Allen / Missy Martin vs Debbi Seelye / Sylvia Guice7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSusie Reynolds vs Jill Cook2-6, 6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kahn / Amber York vs Janelle Bohan / Meredith Wall4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Haden / Angela West vs Jo-Ann Jones / Shannon Rose0-6, 0-6
2024-06-20vs Druid Hills (Alyse Ramer)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Snellings / Missy Martin vs Molly Malone / Grace O'Shea6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKirstie Cohen vs Kimberly Shuman2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeannie Haden / Sherri Kimmell vs Elizabeth Ledet / Kristy Campbell3-6, 5-7
2024-06-19vs South Fulton (Vickie Ware)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesKirstie Cohen / Jeannie Haden vs Janelle Bohan / Jennifer Trevena3-6, 1-2
L#1 SinglesSherri Kimmell vs Bailey Lloyd1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kahn / Tara Allen vs Lucy Crittenden / Jill Cook3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-13vs Capital City (Paula Murray)*Split 22
L#1 DoublesSusie Reynolds / Sherri Kimmell vs Catherine Diffley / Melissa Bailey4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBridgett Prybis vs Valerie Love7-5, 6-7, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Quirk / Susan Harvin vs Paula Murray / Catherine Pittman0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeannie Haden / Jennifer Kahn vs Whitney Sutton / Jane Thomson7-6, 6-2
2024-05-30vs Druid Hills (Alyse Ramer)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSusie Reynolds / Lori Snellings vs Diane Leonard / Alyse Ramer6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kahn / Marian Nesmith vs Andrea Cafarelli / Kayla Williams6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBridgett Prybis vs Niccole Burton4-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs Capital City (Paula Murray)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Levine / Lori Snellings vs Gene Barnes / Paula Murray6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKirstie Cohen vs Valerie Love6-3, 2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSherri Kimmell / Jeannie Haden vs Diane Jones / Tammy Kushel6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNan Easterlin / Bridgett Prybis vs Mary Chambers / Catherine Pittman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Dee Lavender
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Julie Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Missy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Lori Snellings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Cann
published 4
3.52
Kirstie Cohen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Jeannie Haden
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Sherri Kimmell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.27
Bridgett Prybis
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Angela West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Cleveland
published 3.5
3.09
Leslie Suddath
published
2.90
Susan Harvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Kahn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Riddle
published
Susie Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Tara Allen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Levine + Lori Snellings4355% games+3.2% vs expected
Jeannie Haden + Sherri Kimmell2351% games−0.2% vs expected
Angela West + Jeannie Haden134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kahn + Jeannie Haden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Levine
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Missy Martin
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Lori Snellings
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chris Cann
6W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirstie Cohen
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jeannie Haden
19W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Sherri Kimmell
6W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Bridgett Prybis
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Angela West
2W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Cleveland
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Suddath
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Susan Harvin
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jennifer Kahn
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Riddle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Helms Buckner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Reynolds
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Allen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.