Teams

Q team 4.5 18s

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Men 4.5 - 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-25vs Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Chuck Smith vs Stephen Gruener / Jimmy Vroman3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRay Loomis vs Dalton Polesky2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBill Walters vs Nicholas Scott0-6, 0-6
2023-06-22vs Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5MLost 23
L#1 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Chuck Smith vs Joel Thompson / Johncarl Rogge1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRay Loomis vs Dalton Polesky2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Russ Fagg vs Nelson Miller / Paul Beck0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKarl Rudbach vs Joshua Munro6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDick Collum / Kyle Clapham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-20vs Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Chuck Smith vs Nelson Miller / Scott Hanson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRay Loomis vs Joel Thompson3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTyler Brodhead vs Logan Derby7-6, 6-3
2023-06-19vs Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEnrique Osorio / Chuck Smith vs Jimmy Vroman / Scott Hanson1-0
L#1 SinglesRay Loomis vs Nelson Miller1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5M401551098
2Q team 4.5 18s0451530195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Dick Collum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chuck Smith
published 4
3.74
Enrique Osorio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Bill Walters
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Karl Rudbach
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kyle Clapham
published
Ray Loomis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Russ Fagg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Brodhead
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russ Fagg + Raymond Armstrong3521% games−16.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dick Collum
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Chuck Smith
5W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Enrique Osorio
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Bill Walters
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Karl Rudbach
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Clapham
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ray Loomis
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Russ Fagg
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tyler Brodhead
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.