Teams

Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5M

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Men 4.5 - 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.45 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-25vs Q team 4.5 18sWon 50
W#1 DoublesStephen Gruener / Jimmy Vroman vs Enrique Osorio / Chuck Smith6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDalton Polesky vs Ray Loomis6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNelson Miller / Paul Beck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNicholas Scott vs Bill Walters6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Hanson / Joshua Munro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-22vs Q team 4.5 18sWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoel Thompson / Johncarl Rogge vs Enrique Osorio / Chuck Smith6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDalton Polesky vs Ray Loomis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNelson Miller / Paul Beck vs Raymond Armstrong / Russ Fagg6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJoshua Munro vs Karl Rudbach3-6, 2-6
2023-06-20vs Q team 4.5 18sWon 30
W#1 DoublesNelson Miller / Scott Hanson vs Enrique Osorio / Chuck Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephen Gruener / Paul Beck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNicholas Scott / Johncarl Rogge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-19vs Q team 4.5 18sWon 21
L#1 DoublesJimmy Vroman / Scott Hanson vs Enrique Osorio / Chuck Smith0-1
W#1 SinglesNelson Miller vs Ray Loomis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoel Thompson / Johncarl Rogge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Vroman/18&Over4.5M401551098
2Q team 4.5 18s0451530195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Nicholas Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 5
4.30
Stephen Gruener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Johncarl Rogge
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Nelson Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Dalton Polesky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Paul Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Scott Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Joshua Munro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Colter Curey
published 4
3.63
Jimmy Vroman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelson Miller + Johncarl Rogge11756% games+0.0% vs expected
Johncarl Rogge + Paul Beck1544% games−8.1% vs expected
Nelson Miller + Nicholas Scott314 matchesnot enough data
Nelson Miller + Paul Beck224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Beck + Scott Hanson314 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Munro + Scott Hanson123 matchesnot enough data
Jimmy Vroman + Stephen Gruener213 matchesnot enough data
Dalton Polesky + Paul Beck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nicholas Scott
42W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.56
4.5
Stephen Gruener
41W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Johncarl Rogge
36W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Nelson Miller
32W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Dalton Polesky
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Paul Beck
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Scott Hanson
15W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Colter Curey
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Jimmy Vroman
22W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.