Teams

CP-Breaking Point-Hansen

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-07vs Lower Woodland-FerseWon 21
W#1 DoublesMerrie Vieco / Dan Stumpf vs Kim Kobata / Thomas Isarankura6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Warren / John Suk vs Karolina Simons / Max Genereaux6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Darrow / Carol Lelivelt vs Andrew Ygona / Sally Revere3-6, 2-6
2020-11-01vs BETC-Lady NguyenLost 03
L#1 DoublesHao Dang / Helen Suk vs Catherine Thom / Ryan Chan6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Anette Pedersen vs Dieu Nguyen / Daniel Fan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMerrie Vieco / John Suk vs Nelson Phan / Kristin Gallagher6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2020-10-04vs BC-VegarraWon 21
W#1 DoublesMerrie Vieco / Dan Stumpf vs Jose Diaz / Stacy King6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Laricheva / Oliver Graves vs Matt Haba / Maria Recchi6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLana Hansen / Ryan Caldeiro vs Juan Vegarra / Kristin Smith6-7, 4-4
2020-09-26vs CAC/SL-PetersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLana Hansen / Ryan Caldeiro vs Kristin Peters / Rohit Sharma0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Darrow / Carol Lelivelt vs Rick Anderson / Holly Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Neal / Craig Neal vs Mike Mietzner / Margaret Zheng3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-19vs TCSP-WareLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Suk / Hao Dang vs Brooke Miller / Hiromichi Yamamoto6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOliver Graves / Anna Laricheva vs Andrew Inthavong / Susannah Thompson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGenevieve Warren / Dan Stumpf vs Brittany Haffner / Matt Ware6-3, 6-2
2020-09-05vs PSC-Tsai 8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHao Dang / Helen Suk vs Alec DeSouza / Mei-Chin Tsai6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Neal / Michelle Neal vs Denis Tortop / Miho Slavik4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Anette Pedersen vs Kate Wang / Jin Zhang6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-Night is Dark & Full of Errors-Campbell601627112
2FC-Double Shots-Lee5114412134
3TCSP-Waiting For the Sun-Lachenmaier5113512131
4BTA-Team Mana-Kaneshiro5114413137
5WSC-Lopes5113515150
6ETC-Racket Scientists-Zhou5213819180
7TCSP-Griffin5213821182
8CAC/SL-Mixology-Vo5212922175
9AYTC-Juhn4211716135
10AYTC-Mixed Pack-Lee4312920195
11BC-Camara-2021-8.0-Mixed 183311718161
12PSC-Tsai 8.03310819183
13CAC/SL-Peters339923178
14ETC-Slice-Fun-Qi3371123178
15BC-Chen34101125202
16FC-High Strung-Llacuna3491225183
17WSC-Pizza Coopers-Hummer2481022174
18AYTC-Drop Shot Like It's Hot-Shapira2481023168
19Lower Woodland-Ferse2471124172
20TCSP-Ware2461227182
21CP-Breaking Point-Hansen2451327187
22ETC-Kwan2441430195
23CP-Rally Cats-Bengford2591228215
24TCSP-Game On-McIntosh1551328194
25TCSP-Rogers1531533195
26Lower Woodland-Vichitthavong-OG Yeet Fleet1661532218
27MC-Smoking Aces 2-Wilson0651329189
28Lower Woodland-Rockin’ Rebels-Broadwin0621633207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Merrie Vieco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Anette Pedersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Hao Dang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Michelle Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Lana Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Genevieve Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carol Lelivelt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Helen Suk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Girish Patwardhan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Ryan Caldeiro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Dan Stumpf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Oliver Graves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Craig Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
John Suk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Anna Laricheva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Girish Patwardhan + Lana Hansen6360% games+0.1% vs expected
Michelle Neal + Craig Neal3643% games−4.1% vs expected
Ryan Caldeiro + Lana Hansen4547% games−4.3% vs expected
Merrie Vieco + Dan Stumpf314 matchesnot enough data
Dan Stumpf + Genevieve Warren404 matchesnot enough data
Girish Patwardhan + Anette Pedersen044 matchesnot enough data
Hao Dang + Lana Hansen404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Neal + Oliver Graves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Merrie Vieco
113W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Anette Pedersen
54W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Hao Dang
50W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Michelle Neal
59W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Lana Hansen
129W–56L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Genevieve Warren
102W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carol Lelivelt
67W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Helen Suk
53W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Girish Patwardhan
66W–49L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Ryan Caldeiro
23W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Dan Stumpf
74W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Oliver Graves
75W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Craig Neal
47W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
John Suk
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
0
Anna Laricheva
29W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.