Teams

Gorham 55s 3.0W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-06vs Jackson 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Gorham / Monica Medina-Murphy vs Suzi Jackson / Brandye Peterson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Shuster / Kathy Conner vs Caroline Alexander / Karen Geiselhart4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Dufour / Susan Shughart vs Lisa Ashmore Helton / Catherine Wynne2-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs Jackson 55s 3.0W Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Medina-Murphy / Janet Gorham vs Angela Kerr / Jill van Veen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Dufour / Susan Shughart vs Caroline Alexander / Karen Geiselhart6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLori Luempert / Megan Ray vs Lisa Ashmore Helton / Catherine Wynne3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Kathy Conner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Monica Medina-Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Linda Shuster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Susan Shughart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Bobbi McEntee
published 3
2.35
Donna Dufour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Lori Luempert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Gorham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Medina-Murphy + Janet Gorham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Conner
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Monica Medina-Murphy
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Linda Shuster
19W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Susan Shughart
11W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Donna Dufour
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Lori Luempert
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
Janet Gorham
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.