Teams

Jackson 55s 3.0W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-01vs Redding/White 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzi Jackson / Brandye Peterson vs Cindy Wood / Rose Chrismon3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Geiselhart / Lisa Ashmore Helton vs Margaret Lynde-Rhyne / Lydia Nadel6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Wynne / Angela Kerr vs Ann Fair / Michelle Shoemaker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-24vs Sagraves 55s 3.0W Thurs PMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSuzi Jackson / Lisa Ashmore Helton vs Cheryl Ryding / Spring Walsh6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Judy Tsuei vs Gail Tomarchio / Caroline Jones1-6, 1-6
2025-04-17vs Shivaji/Selley 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Kerr / Caroline Alexander vs Donna Burick / Martha Mitman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Geiselhart / Beverly Crisp vs Linda Widman / Sandra Selley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLorraine Rusch / Judy Tsuei vs Mari Miller / Susan Harvey2-6, 0-6
2025-04-06vs Gorham 55s 3.0W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzi Jackson / Brandye Peterson vs Janet Gorham / Monica Medina-Murphy6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCaroline Alexander / Karen Geiselhart vs Linda Shuster / Kathy Conner6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Ashmore Helton / Catherine Wynne vs Donna Dufour / Susan Shughart6-2, 6-0
2025-03-28vs Gorham 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Kerr / Jill van Veen vs Monica Medina-Murphy / Janet Gorham2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCaroline Alexander / Karen Geiselhart vs Donna Dufour / Susan Shughart3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Ashmore Helton / Catherine Wynne vs Lori Luempert / Megan Ray6-3, 6-2
2025-03-23vs Sagraves 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzi Jackson / Caroline Alexander vs Katie Bir / Angela Greene0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorraine Rusch / Jill van Veen vs Spring Walsh / Lisa Hilliard1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrandye Peterson / Lisa Ashmore Helton vs Caroline Jones / Andrea Bushnell6-4, 7-6
2025-03-13vs Shivaji/Selley 55s 3.0W Thurs PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill van Veen / Angela Kerr vs Renuka Shivaji / Martha Mitman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Banister / Beverly Crisp vs Paige Turner / Sandra Selley2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Wynne / Sandra Simpkins vs Mari Miller / Sherri Koenig6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Lisa Ashmore Helton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Suzi Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Catherine Wynne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Brandye Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Sandra Simpkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Jill van Veen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Karen Geiselhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Angela Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.39
Pamela Banister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Judy Tsuei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Beverly Crisp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Crisp + Pamela Banister044 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Banister + Judy Tsuei033 matchesnot enough data
Brandye Peterson + Lisa Ashmore Helton213 matchesnot enough data
Jill van Veen + Sandra Simpkins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Ashmore Helton
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Suzi Jackson
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Brandye Peterson
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Sandra Simpkins
11W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jill van Veen
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Karen Geiselhart
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Angela Kerr
7W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
Pamela Banister
1W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Lorraine Rusch
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Judy Tsuei
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Beverly Crisp
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.