Teams

Sagraves 55s 3.0W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-24vs Jackson 55s 3.0W Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Ryding / Spring Walsh vs Suzi Jackson / Lisa Ashmore Helton2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGail Tomarchio / Caroline Jones vs Sandra Simpkins / Judy Tsuei6-1, 6-1
2025-03-23vs Jackson 55s 3.0W Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Bir / Angela Greene vs Suzi Jackson / Caroline Alexander6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSpring Walsh / Lisa Hilliard vs Lorraine Rusch / Jill van Veen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Jones / Andrea Bushnell vs Brandye Peterson / Lisa Ashmore Helton4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Katie Bir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Angela Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Teresa Sagraves
published
2.91
Gail Tomarchio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Lisa Hilliard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Cheryl Ryding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Deborah Ysidron
published 3
2.72
Meghan Flynn
published
2.63
Selma Ahnert
published
2.57
Andrea Bushnell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.55
Susan Brodeur
published
Leslie Ketner
published
Spring Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Ysidron + Teresa Sagraves123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bir
27W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Angela Greene
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Teresa Sagraves
21W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Gail Tomarchio
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Lisa Hilliard
31W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Cheryl Ryding
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Deborah Ysidron
15W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Meghan Flynn
17W–37L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Selma Ahnert
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Andrea Bushnell
1W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Susan Brodeur
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Leslie Ketner
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Spring Walsh
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.