Teams

Racquet Rebels

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.14 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs Kicking AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Tracy Mediratta vs Tami Dalto / Mary Wilson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Tri-AgainLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Tracy Mediratta vs McKenzie O'Brien / Skyler Boynton4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Robyn Scalzo vs Jamie Lutich / Elizabeth Dickerson5-7, 1-6
2025-09-27vs Tri-ing Our BestWon 10
W#2 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Natalie Martinez / Elisa Buffington6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKerry Distefano / Mari-Ann Kucharek vs Sonia Patrick / Rebecca Evangelista4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobyn Scalzo / Natalie Bloch vs Jenelle Gallaway / Aja Sterling2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Beth Costa
published 4.5
4.10
Marjorie Petruccelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Tracy Mediratta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Mari-Ann Kucharek
published
3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Natalie Bloch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.65
Erin White
published
3.64
Jane Hurman
published
3.40
Sherry Chase
published
3.27
Christine Santucci
published 3.5
Kerry Distefano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lee Bailey
published
Robyn Scalzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Areosa + Marjorie Petruccelli8555% games−2.1% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Kerry Distefano1642% gamesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Tracy Mediratta4258% gamesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Distefano + Marjorie Petruccelli224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Costa
26W–16L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Marjorie Petruccelli
85W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.10
4.5
Tracy Mediratta
45W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Mari-Ann Kucharek
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Natalie Bloch
57W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Erin White
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jane Hurman
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Sherry Chase
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Christine Santucci
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kerry Distefano
39W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lee Bailey
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Scalzo
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.