Teams

Tri-ing Our Best

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs Trifecta TroubleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Minniti / Miriam Medina Cardena vs Michele Ironsmith / Bobbi Witt4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Spears / Jennifer Rogers vs Laura Hungiville / Liwen Tao6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElisa Buffington / Kelly Armagost vs Jenelle Gallaway / Aja Sterling6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Nicole Kipp vs Breezy Paulus / Brooke Rosenberg6-0, 6-1
2025-09-27vs Kicking AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Minniti / Miriam Medina Cardena vs Mary Wilson / Tami Dalto6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeatriz Dones / Irene Arias Gutierrez vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Nicole Kipp vs Zobeida Canfield / Lisa Pyser6-3, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Racquet RebelsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Elisa Buffington vs Connie Weiss / Ana Areosa0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Deb Spears vs Erin White / Sherry Chase4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Olivia Rivas
published
4.12
Andrea Fajardo
published 4.5
4.11
4.01
Melissa Minniti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Beatriz Dones
published 4
3.94
Elisa Buffington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Irene Arias Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Deb Spears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.50
Nicole Kipp
published
3.48
Krissy Heybroek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krissy Heybroek + Deb Spears21859% games+12.3% vs expected
Nicole Kipp + Krissy Heybroek4167% games+9.8% vs expected
Melissa Minniti + Irene Arias Gutierrez1440% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Buffington + Krissy Heybroek4165% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Buffington + Deb Spears303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Rivas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Andrea Fajardo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Miriam Medina Cardena
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Melissa Minniti
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Beatriz Dones
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Elisa Buffington
291W–167L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Irene Arias Gutierrez
65W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Deb Spears
231W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Nicole Kipp
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Krissy Heybroek
212W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.