Teams

Trifecta Trouble

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs Tri Something NewWon 20
W#1 DoublesAbby Kronk / Kayla Dyer vs Pat Brugger / Michele Rose6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Morgan Domson vs Kristin Knous / Kim Reiser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Tri-ing Our BestWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Bobbi Witt vs Melissa Minniti / Miriam Medina Cardena6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Natalie Martinez / Kelly Armagost6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Liwen Tao vs Deb Spears / Jennifer Rogers2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Bobbi Witt vs Ashley Leary / Thuy Duong2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Tiffany Garner / Shannon Griffin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Karin Hartenbach vs Breezy Paulus / Kenzier McIntyre4-6, 0-6
2025-09-27vs Tri-AgainSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Jamie Lutich / Christina Dausch6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKarin Hartenbach / Robin Gerlach vs Stephanie van Brocklin / Ashley Rhattigan4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Kayla Dyer
published
4.18
Abby Kronk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Kirsten Willis
published
3.84
Sigrid Bratic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Morgan Domson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Robin Gerlach
published
3.32
Laura Hungiville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Karin Hartenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Liwen Tao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sigrid Bratic + Morgan Domson331157% games+3.4% vs expected
Abby Kronk + Elizabeth Gerlach6059% gamesnot enough data
Michele Ironsmith + Elizabeth Gerlach404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
Kayla Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Abby Kronk
69W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Kirsten Willis
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Sigrid Bratic
124W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Morgan Domson
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Robin Gerlach
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Karin Hartenbach
48W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.