Teams

Tri Something New

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesDana Slackman / Michele Rose vs Rebecca Evangelista / Sonia Patrick0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Knous / Kim Reiser vs Tiffany Garner / Shannon Griffin6-7, 4-6
2025-09-28vs Trifecta TroubleLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Knous / Kim Reiser vs Sigrid Bratic / Morgan Domson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs Kicking AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesPat Brugger / Dana Slackman vs Sally Alford / Cindy Fancher1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Doe / Dorene Seider vs Yudi Carpenter / Nina Mortazavi3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Barth / Kristen Weston vs Alicia Cohler / Sandra Poston4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Tri-AgainLost 03
L#1 DoublesPat Brugger / Dana Slackman vs McKenzie O'Brien / Christina Dausch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Voke / Dorene Seider vs Jennifer Price / Kristen Wehrman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Catherine Bartlett vs Kaitlyn Caterinicchia / Stephanie van Brocklin1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Pat Brugger
published 4.5
4.02
Michele Rose
published
3.95
Dana Slackman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Joy Voke
published
3.92
Kim Reiser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kristin Knous
published
3.57
Dorene Seider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Monica Barth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Kristen Weston
published
3.47
Marina Hulbert
published
3.17
Catherine Bartlett
published 3.5
3.02
Terry Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Reiser + Kristen Weston2348% games+2.4% vs expected
Marina Hulbert + Kristen Weston224 matchesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Joy Voke303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pat Brugger
55W–34L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
4.11
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
4.02
4
Dana Slackman
38W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Joy Voke
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Kristin Knous
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Dorene Seider
109W–119L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Monica Barth
130W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kristen Weston
34W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Marina Hulbert
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Catherine Bartlett
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Terry Olsen
80W–129L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.