Teams

BHRC - Ramey

2025 B'ham Tri-Level Weekday - 40 & Over Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday Partial Round Robin

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-17vs Pinetree - PattersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Rinks / Sherri Lynn Murdock vs Michelle Henderson / Kim Hall5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Fisher / Carolyn Ramey vs Mary Allen Diddell / Susannah Wolsfelt2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Elliott / Susan Schaper vs Brittany Patterson / Mary Evelyn O'Neil1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-13vs OOC - Cunningham/KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulia Rinks / Sherri Lynn Murdock vs Ramona Cunningham / Caroline Davis5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristy Miley / Carolyn Ramey vs Jaime Sullivan / Rachel Green6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Leah Doss vs Natalie Meisler / Gretchen Pickett6-3, 6-4
2025-06-10vs Inverness CC - McClanahanLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherri Lynn Murdock / Kristy Miley vs Julie Schweer / Teresa Keasler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Ramey / Elizabeth Masingill vs Rebecca Sandidge / Mallory Carrington4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Schaper / Rachel Elliott vs Andrea Rudder / Julianna Vaughn4-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs PRC - BOWDEN/TULost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Foster / Sherri Lynn Murdock vs Brantley Bowden / Nicole Ussery0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Fisher / Kristy Miley vs Jane Haines / Selina Maddox4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Elizabeth Masingill vs Shena Brown / Sara Liles1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Greystone CC - Brewer/RobertsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia Rinks / Sherri Lynn Murdock vs Andie Mango / Jackie Davis1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Ramey / Kristy Miley vs Whitney Wilson / Marilyn Pauls3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Schaper / Rachel Elliott vs Suzanne Wildmon / Christy Jackson0-6, 0-6
2025-05-13vs Greystone CC - KnouseLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Foster / Julia Rinks vs Tammy McClure / Donna Gordon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Fisher / Stephanie Gifford vs Angie Beaubien / Shannon Dennis0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Elizabeth Masingill vs Kelly Barnes / Anne McGavin6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday Partial Round Robin
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pinetree - Patterson5113513128
2Homewood - White/Calagaz5112613127
3LTF - CHUNN 40s Tri4210820178
4Greystone CC - Knouse3310817149
5Inverness CC - McClanahan3310820168
6Vestavia Country Club - Ozols339920163
7PRC - BOWDEN/TU3310822166
8OOC - Cunningham/Key339922174
9Greystone CC - Brewer/Roberts2481020155
10PRC - Lyons/Walker2451329190
11BHRC - Ramey0631532203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Julia Rinks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lisa Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Carolyn Ramey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Sherri Lynn Murdock
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.22
Kristy Miley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Lynn Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Stephanie Gifford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Elizabeth Masingill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Rachel Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Leah Doss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Susan Schaper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Fisher + Carolyn Ramey6356% games+1.8% vs expected
Susan Schaper + Rachel Elliott151055% games+0.3% vs expected
Carolyn Ramey + Kristy Miley8848% games−2.7% vs expected
Lisa Foster + Julia Rinks6649% games−3.0% vs expected
Stephanie Gifford + Carolyn Ramey31343% games−3.4% vs expected
Sherri Lynn Murdock + Julia Rinks224 matchesnot enough data
Leah Doss + Carolyn Ramey134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Fisher + Kristy Miley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Rinks
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lisa Foster
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Carolyn Ramey
27W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Sherri Lynn Murdock
31W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kristy Miley
19W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Lynn Fisher
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Stephanie Gifford
19W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Masingill
24W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Rachel Elliott
56W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Leah Doss
50W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Susan Schaper
45W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.