Teams

OOC - Cunningham/Key

2025 B'ham Tri-Level Weekday - 40 & Over Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday Partial Round Robin

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-17vs PRC - Lyons/WalkerLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davis / Karen Keene vs Juli Drouin / Linda Edmonds6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Adams / Jaime Sullivan vs Tracey Ponder / Alison Walker1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Meisler / Gretchen Pickett vs Jennifer Cooke / Kim Rushton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-13vs BHRC - RameyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRamona Cunningham / Caroline Davis vs Julia Rinks / Sherri Lynn Murdock7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJaime Sullivan / Rachel Green vs Kristy Miley / Carolyn Ramey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNatalie Meisler / Gretchen Pickett vs Jennifer Smith / Leah Doss3-6, 4-6
2025-06-10vs Homewood - White/CalagazWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davis / Emily Key vs Andrea Belue / Daniela Barber6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKylie Drummond / Lana Shoultz vs Jennifer Chadha / Julie Price4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Preskitt / Britt Puckett vs Jennifer Drake / Cassandra Hall1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-03vs LTF - CHUNN 40s TriLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamona Cunningham / Caroline Davis vs Leah Taylor / Lani Perrigo2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJordan Elder / Emily Key vs Karen Lawrence / Tracy Trego6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNatalie Meisler / Heather Preskitt vs Cezanne Ferguson / Kim Beck7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Pinetree - PattersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Davis / Emily Key vs Ann Wade Shreve / Mindy Rayburn3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Adams / Lana Shoultz vs Michelle Kelly / Leigh Louis2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGretchen Pickett / Natalie Meisler vs Mary Evelyn O'Neil / Brittany Patterson6-3, 7-5
2025-05-13vs Inverness CC - McClanahanWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Davis / Karen Keene vs Julie Schweer / Teresa Keasler6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJordan Elder / Kylie Drummond vs Emily Whitehead / Rebecca Mathis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBritt Puckett / Heather Preskitt vs Andrea Rudder / Julie Purner7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday Partial Round Robin
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pinetree - Patterson5113513128
2Homewood - White/Calagaz5112613127
3LTF - CHUNN 40s Tri4210820178
4Greystone CC - Knouse3310817149
5Inverness CC - McClanahan3310820168
6Vestavia Country Club - Ozols339920163
7PRC - BOWDEN/TU3310822166
8OOC - Cunningham/Key339922174
9Greystone CC - Brewer/Roberts2481020155
10PRC - Lyons/Walker2451329190
11BHRC - Ramey0631532203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Caroline Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Karen Keene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Ramona Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Emily Key
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jaime Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Gretchen Pickett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.30
Lana Shoultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Britt Puckett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jordan Elder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Kylie Drummond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Rachel Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Heather Preskitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Natalie Meisler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Britt Puckett + Kylie Drummond6056% games+12.0% vs expected
Ramona Cunningham + Caroline Davis314 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Pickett + Natalie Meisler224 matchesnot enough data
Britt Puckett + Lana Shoultz314 matchesnot enough data
Lana Shoultz + Caroline Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Sullivan + Jordan Elder123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Key + Natalie Meisler213 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Meisler + Lana Shoultz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Davis
19W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Karen Keene
52W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Ramona Cunningham
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Emily Key
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Jaime Sullivan
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3
Gretchen Pickett
42W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Lana Shoultz
53W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Britt Puckett
29W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Jordan Elder
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Kylie Drummond
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Rachel Green
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Heather Preskitt
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
Natalie Meisler
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.