Teams

ST MARY 40AW3.5A-DT

2024 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Rosanne Kim
published
3.36
Nancy Perches
published
3.33
Linda Hofmeister
published
3.32
Margaret Worden
published
3.25
Susan Rossi
published
3.17
Lisa Haskell
published
3.17
Sharon Langtry
published
3.16
Kathy Simon
published
3.14
Rachel Schmidt
published
3.11
Caroline Hauck
published 3.5
3.11
Lisa Palma
published
2.97
Paula Garcia
published
2.83
Janice Stephens
published
Pauline Ho
published
Sharyn Lawrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Rossi + Linda Hofmeister2544% games−3.5% vs expected
Linda Hofmeister + Rachel Schmidt213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Palma + Sharon Langtry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosanne Kim
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Nancy Perches
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Linda Hofmeister
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Margaret Worden
15W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Susan Rossi
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Lisa Haskell
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Sharon Langtry
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Kathy Simon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Rachel Schmidt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Caroline Hauck
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lisa Palma
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
Paula Garcia
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Janice Stephens
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.83
Pauline Ho
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharyn Lawrence
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.