Teams

FCCC WHITE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.69 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs LVTA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelli Barber / Haley Hasler vs Elizabeth Smith / Austin Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Karen Preiss vs Kim Jensen / Cathy Simon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaylyn Shelby / Tahni Clay vs Debbie Hansen / Vicky Hadley6-1, 6-3
2024-05-23vs HMTC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Tynan / Kelsey Nosler vs Sharon Sturges / Teresa Adsit6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHaley Hasler / Elaine Valenza vs Stacey Fox / Maria Ellis6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaylyn Shelby / Tahni Clay vs Angela Brown / Kathleen Vandenberg6-0, 6-1
2024-05-16vs TAG BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulia Tynan / Haley Hasler vs Janice Mossberg / Lisa Novacek6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelli Barber / Karen Preiss vs Amber Slade / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Kristen Switzer6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTahni Clay / Kaylyn Shelby vs Anna Anderle / April Clement6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-09vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelli Barber / Haley Hasler vs Laura Powers / Brittney Stephenson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Julia Tynan vs Jill Brooks / Falguni Gill6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Paige Kanatous6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaylyn Shelby / Karen Preiss vs Michelle Peyton / Alana Tutt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-02vs FCCC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulia Tynan / Haley Hasler vs Lisa Clay / Jennifer Camp6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Jane Schmelzle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Karen Preiss vs Karen Dunbar / Betsy Markey6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTahni Clay / Kaylyn Shelby vs Lisa Olsen / Karen DeLine6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-25vs LVTA ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJulia Tynan / Haley Hasler vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Dawn Hagen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Elizabeth Gowins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTahni Clay / Stephanie Kemp vs Debbie Hansen / Nancy Pflughoeft6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Tina Geoghan vs Cathy Simon / Kim Jensen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-18vs HMTC PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulia Tynan / Haley Hasler vs Sharon Sturges / Cimarron Spitz6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Gina Zachman6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Preiss / Kelsey Nosler vs Teresa Adsit / Julie Ignowski6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTahni Clay / Kelli Barber vs Maria Ellis / Wendy Ball6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Julia Tynan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Karen Preiss
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Kelsey Nosler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.44
Haley Hasler
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.44
Stephanie Kemp
published
3.39
Aileen VanMeveren
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Kayla Gosz
published 3.5
3.31
Elaine Valenza
published
3.26
Kelli Barber
published
3.26
Tahni Clay
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.02
Kaylyn Shelby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Preiss + Aileen VanMeveren5059% games+8.7% vs expected
Karen Preiss + Haley Hasler10458% games+4.9% vs expected
Julia Tynan + Kelsey Nosler22857% games+2.8% vs expected
Karen Preiss + Kelli Barber3745% games+2.3% vs expected
Karen Preiss + Kaylyn Shelby15958% games+0.8% vs expected
Kaylyn Shelby + Tahni Clay12952% games−1.2% vs expected
Aileen VanMeveren + Kaylyn Shelby5551% games−3.2% vs expected
Julia Tynan + Haley Hasler181356% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julia Tynan
84W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Karen Preiss
116W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Kelsey Nosler
94W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
4
Haley Hasler
122W–105L career · 7 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Stephanie Kemp
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Aileen VanMeveren
85W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Kayla Gosz
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Elaine Valenza
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelli Barber
16W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Tahni Clay
99W–72L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Kaylyn Shelby
55W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.