Teams

McKenzie/Callaghan 55s 4.0W Mon PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesVickie Degges / Floy Collis vs Diane Kroeger / Terri Shantry0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Sinclair / Ronette Duhe vs Bonnie Satterfield / Martha Fogleman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Nichols Hill / Paula Tedford vs Cheryl Scott / Gwen Highsmith-Quick1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPamela Aikens / Vickie Degges vs Joy Martin / Bonnie Satterfield2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRonette Duhe / Gina Kinard vs Cheryl Scott / Lori Harrington3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Susan Sinclair vs Annie Chapman / Martha Fogleman4-6, 1-6
2025-03-03vs Brown 55s 4.0W Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Calkins / Gina Kinard vs Carolyn Pellerin / Yukari Matsuoka2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Sinclair / Vickie Degges vs Kathy Hedgecock / Catherine Tanner0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Richardson / Sherri Nichols Hill vs Kathy Brown / Janel Green0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Floy Collis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Pamela Aikens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Susan Calkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Ronette Duhe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amy Callaghan
published 3.5
3.12
Vickie Degges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Gina Kinard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Susan Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Brenda MacFadden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Paula Tedford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Nichols Hill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Floy Collis
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Susan Calkins
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Ronette Duhe
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Callaghan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Vickie Degges
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gina Kinard
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Susan Sinclair
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Brenda MacFadden
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Paula Tedford
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sherri Nichols Hill
0W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.