Teams

Westchester Country Club

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 4.0 Day

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-05vs RRC: The Go GosLost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Haynes English / Kimberly Heavey vs Lauren Lazar / Liz Fleischman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Nace / Christina Razook vs Heather Thompson / Victoria Maggard7-5, 2-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Fraser / Margot Sweeney vs Sandra Khouri / Amy Kaufman3-6, 3-6
2025-11-13vs MTDZ: Match MakersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Heavey / Chase Haynes English vs Beth Capelin / Yumi Nagahama4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Nace / Margot Sweeney vs Misaki Reinoso / Mariko Abdel-Rahman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bave / Meredith Lorito vs Elizabeth Sipprelle / Ayako Tsukamoto6-1, 6-2
2025-11-05vs Sportime LI: High PercentageWon 30
W#1 DoublesChase Haynes English / Kimberly Heavey vs Brooke Sanders / Kristi Montanaro6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargot Sweeney / Elizabeth Nace vs Mallory Hutchinson / Valerie Chuebon7-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Furnary / Christy Schultze vs Frances Milliken / Deborah Antoine6-1, 6-3
2025-10-09vs Sportime LI: AceholesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Haynes English / Elizabeth Nace vs Kathryn Hommel / Carolyne Rainero2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bave / Margot Sweeney vs Kathryn Biggs / Joanie Terraciano3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJess Fuchs / Katie Watson vs Nicole Burgess / Michele McInerney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-03vs WTC: 4.0 SparkleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Heavey / Elizabeth Nace vs Jennifer Ryan / Ruth Libin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarybeth Leahy / Margot Sweeney vs Nina Brandt / Lauren Henn Devaney3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJess Fuchs / Christina Razook vs Jennifer Helgesen / Vivian Portillo6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs NRRC: Smash and DashLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargot Sweeney / Sarah Fraser vs Julia McMillan / Rebecca Dvorkin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bave / Christy Schultze vs Corey Cook / Kaitlan Cantwell0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJess Fuchs / Kimberly Heavey vs Darcy Froehlich / Jennifer Keefe6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Catherine Bave
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Kimberly Heavey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.80
Meredith Lorito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Elizabeth Nace
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Laura Furnary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Christina Razook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Allison Roarty
published 4
3.69
Marybeth Leahy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Margot Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Chase Haynes English
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jess Fuchs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Christy Schultze
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Katie Watson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Sarah Fraser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Amantea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Bave + Jess Fuchs6164% games+26.3% vs expected
Jess Fuchs + Kimberly Heavey12560% games+13.7% vs expected
Jess Fuchs + Margot Sweeney4254% games+12.0% vs expected
Margot Sweeney + Sarah Fraser11659% games+11.4% vs expected
Catherine Bave + Kimberly Heavey10464% games+8.1% vs expected
Laura Furnary + Christina Razook11462% games+8.1% vs expected
Laura Furnary + Sarah Fraser7067% games+6.8% vs expected
Chase Haynes English + Kimberly Heavey8257% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Bave
65W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Kimberly Heavey
76W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Meredith Lorito
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Elizabeth Nace
19W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Laura Furnary
34W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Christina Razook
28W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Allison Roarty
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Marybeth Leahy
34W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Margot Sweeney
37W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.61
4
Chase Haynes English
32W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jess Fuchs
63W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Christy Schultze
55W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Katie Watson
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sarah Fraser
56W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Amantea
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.