Teams

Sportime LI: Aceholes

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 4.0 Day

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-21vs MTDZ: Match MakersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanie Terraciano / Jessica Pearson vs Jennifer Chan / Sharon Ho6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarolyne Rainero / Elaine Chang vs Mary Sniffen / Carol Myers7-5, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Isenbarger / Michele McInerney vs Holly Collier / Kate Vaughey4-6, 6-7
2025-11-13vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Burgess / Carolyne Rainero vs Bret Sommer / Danielle Herbst6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Chang / Joanie Terraciano vs Melissa Frank / Suzanne Sullivan5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Sally Connolly vs Laura Zarba / Tanya Meyers6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-07vs WTC: 4.0 SparkleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Pearson / Kathryn Hommel vs Nina Brandt / Lauren Henn Devaney1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSally Connolly / Joanie Terraciano vs Faith Ackerman / Ruth Libin3-6, 1-6
2025-10-30vs RRC: The Go GosLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Chang / Kathryn Hommel vs Lauren Lazar / Amy Kaufman6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSally Connolly / Joanie Terraciano vs June Hatch / Nicole van Maanen2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJill Isenbarger / Jessica Pearson vs Sandra Khouri / Lauren Rosen6-2, 6-4
2025-10-24vs NRRC: Smash and DashSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyne Rainero / Kathryn Hommel vs Julia McMillan / Rebecca Dvorkin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Burgess / Kathryn Biggs vs Olga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts7-5, 6-4
2025-10-16vs Sportime HILost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Chang / Kathryn Hommel vs Tori Brennan / Alison Brown6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Sally Connolly vs Sondra Lavin / Casey Rosenblum5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Isenbarger / Michele McInerney vs Aileen Calnan-Burke / Sherlia Shi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-09vs Westchester Country ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hommel / Carolyne Rainero vs Chase Haynes English / Elizabeth Nace6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Joanie Terraciano vs Catherine Bave / Margot Sweeney6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicole Burgess / Michele McInerney vs Jess Fuchs / Katie Watson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-17vs Sportime LI: High PercentageWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Pearson / Elaine Chang vs Leslie McCutcheon / Lindsay Martin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanie Terraciano / Sally Connolly vs Robin Good / Joyce Maron4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyne Rainero / Michele McInerney vs Leah Rapoport / Brooke Sanders6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Carolyne Rainero
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Margo Coble
published
3.71
Kathryn Hommel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Joanie Terraciano
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.67
Nicole Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Kathryn Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Michele McInerney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Elaine Chang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Sally Connolly
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Jessica Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Jill Isenbarger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paisley Kelling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Hommel + Margo Coble6253% games+10.0% vs expected
Carolyne Rainero + Jessica Pearson7561% games+7.6% vs expected
Elaine Chang + Jessica Pearson7355% games+7.3% vs expected
Carolyne Rainero + Kathryn Hommel13758% games+7.0% vs expected
Jill Isenbarger + Margo Coble432258% games+6.8% vs expected
Elaine Chang + Kathryn Hommel4551% games+2.5% vs expected
Jessica Pearson + Margo Coble4262% games+2.4% vs expected
Elaine Chang + Carolyne Rainero383153% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyne Rainero
101W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Margo Coble
79W–37L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Kathryn Hommel
112W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Joanie Terraciano
48W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Nicole Burgess
26W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Kathryn Biggs
76W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Michele McInerney
24W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Elaine Chang
71W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Sally Connolly
52W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jessica Pearson
93W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Jill Isenbarger
77W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Paisley Kelling
51W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.