Teams

KY/LEX/Martin

2025 USTA COMBO LEAGUE 40 & OVER LEXINGTO · 7.5 ADULT WOMEN

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-14vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Cole / Emily Diehl vs Grace McGonigle / Sarah Delahanty4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Montgomery / Carmen Amato vs Anne Faulconer / Connie Bishop6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulia Stevens / Janine Coy vs Lori Brunner / Jennifer Wilson7-6, 6-4
2025-08-25vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynn Russo / Sarah Stykes vs Laurie Larkin / Kenda Moore5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Emily Diehl vs Anne Faulconer / Sarah Delahanty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Bramble / Tami Neal vs Lori Brunner / Cristi Hundley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-10vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Bramble / Carmen Amato vs Lori Brunner / Hiroko Nakata0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanine Coy / Elizabeth Montgomery vs Jennifer Janes / Jennifer Wilson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Bridgett Barton vs Julie Carlisle / Kenda Moore6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Elizabeth Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Lynn Russo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Ann Hays
published 4
3.57
Cindy Bramble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Tammy Mitchell
published
3.54
Carmen Amato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.53
Julia Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Bridgett Barton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Sarah Stykes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Emily Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Janine Coy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Ikuko Nakanishi
published
3.27
Mary Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Doris Senters
published
3.16
Nancy Bailey
published
3.09
Martha Martin
published
Lola Baker
published
Tami Neal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Montgomery + Nancy Bailey3256% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Carmen Amato7163% games+4.0% vs expected
Tammy Mitchell + Mary Cole3448% games+4.0% vs expected
Janine Coy + Doris Senters3351% games−2.6% vs expected
Nancy Bailey + Carmen Amato2341% games−4.6% vs expected
Martha Martin + Bridgett Barton314 matchesnot enough data
Bridgett Barton + Carmen Amato314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Montgomery
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Lynn Russo
134W–123L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Ann Hays
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Cindy Bramble
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tammy Mitchell
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carmen Amato
37W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Julia Stevens
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bridgett Barton
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Sarah Stykes
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Ikuko Nakanishi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Mary Cole
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Nancy Bailey
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Martha Martin
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Lola Baker
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tami Neal
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.