Teams

LCTA18/GRIMM/LTPDI

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 8.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Sachs
published 4.5
Brett Trambow
published 4.5
4.00
Elyssa Snelgrove
published 4
3.83
Molly Sapienza
published
3.72
Neil Shannon
published
3.72
Annmarie Taggio
published 4
3.63
Kirsten Lanphear
published
3.59
Steve Morse
published
3.58
Nanda Ragala
published
3.57
Keith Pridgen
published
3.44
Mary Turbeville
published
3.40
Phil Gaul
published
3.38
Kevin Kuehmeier
published
3.35
Deana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.35
Derek Goulette
published 3.5
3.25
Erin Grimm
published 3.5
Denise Gosnell
published 3.5
3.13
Dana Cumbie
published 3.5
Jason Vanderver
published
Lauren Goulette
published
Mercedes Trambow
published
Sarah Hanna
published
William Botts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Cumbie + Dana Cumbie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Sachs
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brett Trambow
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Elyssa Snelgrove
73W–54L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Molly Sapienza
43W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Neil Shannon
41W–32L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Annmarie Taggio
77W–71L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Kirsten Lanphear
54W–42L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Steve Morse
20W–22L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Nanda Ragala
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.58
Keith Pridgen
103W–101L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mary Turbeville
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
Phil Gaul
38W–75L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.40
Kevin Kuehmeier
45W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Deana Cumbie
55W–75L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Derek Goulette
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Erin Grimm
51W–55L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Denise Gosnell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dana Cumbie
46W–52L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
Jason Vanderver
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Goulette
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mercedes Trambow
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Hanna
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Botts
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.