← Search

Deana Cumbie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
364 matches · 155W–209L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history364 matches
L
2026-06-10 · LCTA (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Tyner) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruni Koch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Tyner) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Tyner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · LCTA (B) 3.5M 40 & Over (Tyner) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Art Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Keith championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · LCTA (B) 3.5M 40 & Over (Tyner) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Art Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Anderson
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · LCTA (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Tyner) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Tyner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · LCTA55/Jones/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · LCTA (B) 4.0W 40 & Over (Ronk) · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Henney
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-05 · LCTA18/Gardner/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-04 · LCTA18/Bernstein/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Keith
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-24 · LCTA40/Urbanic/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Anderson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 52.7% of games
3.5
40.9%
56W–81L · 46.8% of games
4.0
17%
8W–39L · 36.1% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.1% of games
6.5
52.3%
23W–21L · 53.3% of games
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.2% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 26.8% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
53.1%
17W–15L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
132 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
72 matches
#1 Singles
9%
34 matches
#2 Singles
8%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal