Teams

CX 7.5 MV Mixon

2026 NEOTA Combo Mixed · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CX 7.5 TP Derrig000000
2CX 7.5 MV Haught000000
3CX 7.5 PM Nita000000
4CX 7.5 MM Mei000000
5CX 7.5 PW Lonsway000000
6CX 7.5 MV Mixon000000
7CX 7.5 LT Kim000000
8CX 7.5 PM Perkins000000
9CX 7.5 CL Wise000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jim Batchik
published
3.85
Motoo Saito
published
3.69
GAUTAM PATHAK
published 4
3.51
Karen Cipriani
published
3.49
Joseph Stimac
published
3.48
Eileen Connell
published 3.5
3.38
Craig Nine
published 3.5
3.37
Preet Kang
published
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
published
3.16
Caren Kirchick
published 3.5
3.11
Tasha Mixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Connell + Craig Nine6654% gamesnot enough data
Preet Kang + Tasha Mixon3340% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Stimac + Eileen Connell404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Cipriani + Preet Kang303 matchesnot enough data
Jim Batchik + Eileen Connell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Batchik
69W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.90
Motoo Saito
38W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
GAUTAM PATHAK
113W–71L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Cipriani
86W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Joseph Stimac
51W–109L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Eileen Connell
176W–88L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Craig Nine
107W–71L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Preet Kang
43W–55L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Caren Kirchick
79W–79L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Tasha Mixon
44W–67L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.