Teams

SFV - Different Strokes

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 SinglesShaurya Dhankar vs Dan Kashuck4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLeonardo Kim / Adam Dong vs Vishal Raghunath / Joe Chan6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesGabriel Yassky vs Kevin Ng6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs SFV - CalabasasWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeonardo Kim / Marcus Liou vs Paul Sinuk / Shohachi Haneda7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGiacomo Picasso vs Adam Kaufman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHomayoun Ostadhossein vs Navarro Jordan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSebastien Damas / Renaldo Goncalves vs Michael Marley / Conrad Chilcott3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Vielajus vs Derrick Perry1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJASON FREEDMAN / Homayoun Ostadhossein vs Elan Ruspoli / Brandon Su3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGabriel Yassky vs Ik Jun5-7, 3-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.57
Shaurya Dhankar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.30
Amir Navab
published 4.5
4.29
Gabriel Yassky
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Adam Dong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Ashley Lin
published 4.5
4.23
Sebastien Damas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Leonardo Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
TEVIN JENKINS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Thomas Vielajus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.95
Renaldo Goncalves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Marcus Liou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Saeed Saed
published
Aris Reyes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Giacomo Picasso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Homayoun Ostadhossein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
JASON FREEDMAN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shaurya Dhankar
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.57
4.5
Amir Navab
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Gabriel Yassky
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Adam Dong
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Lin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sebastien Damas
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Thomas Vielajus
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.03
Renaldo Goncalves
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Marcus Liou
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
Saeed Saed
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
4
Aris Reyes
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Giacomo Picasso
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Homayoun Ostadhossein
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
JASON FREEDMAN
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.