Teams

OC Costa Mesa - Dee - Sun9

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 7.0 Super Seniors Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-23vs OC Irvine LPC - Sharon - Sun9Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoy Peterson / Robin Briones vs Sharon Diekneit / Pam Zitny6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Jacquetta Perkins vs Leslie Flower / Karen Holmes5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Grom / Christine Ontiveros vs Kim Quaglierini / Jill Chomer3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 7.0 Super Seniors Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Robin Briones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Barbara Grom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Mary Goff
published 3.5
3.33
Jacquetta Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Joy Skillman
published
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Dee Harriman
published 3.5
3.09
Carol Melvin
published 3.5
3.02
Noriko Imai
published
Christine Ontiveros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Barloon
published
Teresa Mittman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Goff + Dee Harriman4641% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Foy-Asaro + Robin Briones044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Goff + Robin Briones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robin Briones
111W–135L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Barbara Grom
50W–144L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Mary Goff
74W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Jacquetta Perkins
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Joy Skillman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Dee Harriman
60W–62L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Carol Melvin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Noriko Imai
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Christine Ontiveros
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Karen Barloon
0W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Mittman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.