Teams

OC Irvine LPC - Sharon - Sun9

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 7.0 Super Seniors Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs OC Court Legends - Susan - Sat11Won 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Julie Vislay vs Nancy Jewell / Patricia Heneise7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGloria Medina / Betty Shiihara vs Susan Tibbetts / Cheryl Hirtler7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Holmes / Jill Chomer vs Mary Becker / Eileen Asahi6-4, 6-1
2026-08-23vs OC Costa Mesa - Dee - Sun9Won 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Pam Zitny vs Joy Peterson / Robin Briones7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLeslie Flower / Karen Holmes vs Kathleen Foy-Asaro / Jacquetta Perkins7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Quaglierini / Jill Chomer vs Barbara Grom / Christine Ontiveros6-3, 6-1
2026-08-22vs OC Court Legends - Susan - Sat11Won 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Betty Shiihara vs Vicki Brown / Oanh Richards6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Holmes / Leslie Flower vs Cheryl Hirtler / Susan Tibbetts6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGloria Medina / Jill Chomer vs Nancy Jewell / Eileen Asahi6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 7.0 Super Seniors Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Julie Vislay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Marta Ohara
published
3.41
Gloria Medina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Sharon Diekneit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Betty Shiihara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Kim Quaglierini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Elizabeth Frost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Leslie Flower
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Chomer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Zitny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Vislay
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Marta Ohara
0W–16L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Gloria Medina
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Sharon Diekneit
186W–204L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Betty Shiihara
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Kim Quaglierini
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Leslie Flower
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jill Chomer
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pam Zitny
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.