Teams

Ice Princesses

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-06vs ComadrAce Fire and IceLost 03
L#1 DoublesIrma Trevino / Doreen Amft vs Amanda Alexander / Amanda Barto0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLori Castellaw / Gina Jones vs Pamela Vinals / SELINA TREVINO3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Gauthier / Ivonne Rivera vs Andrea Gallegos / Gabriela Tawil3-6, 2-6
2025-12-06vs Slay BellesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Jones / Allie Anderson vs Natalie Samson / Chelsea Mills4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIrma Trevino / Doreen Amft vs Monica Slaydon / Stephanie Hankins3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLori Castellaw / Gina Jones vs Laurie Winters / Emily Brown4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-05vs Sleigh All DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lakata / Bessie Trammell vs Claudia Odio / Heather Wilkinson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllie Anderson / Gina Rodriguez vs Holly Nelson / Maria Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Castellaw / Gina Jones vs Jackie Kemp / Danna Halff6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Maggie Lakata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Gina Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lori Castellaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Karen Gauthier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Allie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Irma Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Bessie Trammell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Ivonne Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Doreen Amft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bessie Trammell + Maggie Lakata9257% games+5.1% vs expected
Irma Trevino + Gina Rodriguez11554% games−1.2% vs expected
Doreen Amft + Irma Trevino4645% games−2.4% vs expected
Karen Gauthier + Gina Rodriguez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Lakata
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Gina Rodriguez
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Lori Castellaw
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Karen Gauthier
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Allie Anderson
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Irma Trevino
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Bessie Trammell
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Ivonne Rivera
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Doreen Amft
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.