Teams

BVP RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-30vs LTC-M GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesLoretta Chang / Sanjana Chintalapudi vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Joy Herrin0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Stemerman vs McCall Board6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Markwell / Sophie Dimoff vs Denise Belk / Margaret Harwood6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs Maeve Kearney0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCameron Passmore / Sarah Plagenza vs Melissa Louie / Toni Barnett6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-22vs SS-LGT ORANGELost 23
L#1 DoublesLoretta Chang / Sanjana Chintalapudi vs Kate Strecker / Lindsey Markley5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSophie Dimoff vs Perri Anderson0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmese Nagy / Emily Markwell vs Kristin Danford / Avery Tilney7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs Lauren Tripp6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCameron Passmore / Sarah Plagenza vs Alisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein6-7, 6-7
2026-05-12vs KC-RH PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnitra Sopronyi / Sanjana Chintalapudi vs Megan Melucci / Leigh Hardin5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSophie Dimoff vs Grace Koza3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Markwell / Emese Nagy vs Sarah Chomko / Mikaela Potter6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCameron Passmore / Sarah Plagenza vs Lara Callas / Meghan Geisler7-5, 6-3
2026-04-28vs LTC-M GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesErica Dempsey / Sophie Dimoff vs Taryn Fleming / Michelle Wadas2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs Maeve Kearney1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmese Nagy / Emily Markwell vs Joy Herrin / Elizabeth Alcorn1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRachel Stemerman vs Mary Brennan6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSanjana Chintalapudi / Loretta Chang vs Denise Belk / Kristina Brandner5-7, 2-6
2026-04-21vs KC-RH PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesEmily Markwell / Emese Nagy vs Leigh Hardin / Megan Melucci3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Stemerman vs Grace Koza2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErica Dempsey / Sophie Dimoff vs Meghan Geisler / Mikaela Potter4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Margaret Lamb6-2, 4-1
W#3 DoublesAnitra Sopronyi / Krysta Szeto vs Debbie Lathrop / Shannon Kiebler7-6, 6-4
2026-04-14vs SS-LGT ORANGEWon 32
W#1 DoublesEmese Nagy / Emily Markwell vs Jordan Campbell / Lindsey Markley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Stemerman vs Lauren Tripp1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErica Dempsey / Loretta Chang vs Laura Montoya / Kaitlyn Bridgers5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs Aubrey Zahuranec6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCameron Passmore / Krysta Szeto vs Kristin Danford / Alisa Phelps3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KC-RH PURPLE33141635280
2LAC PURPLE33151537301
3MEA PURPLE15111942311
4BVP RED15111942322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Rachel Stemerman
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.32
Emily Markwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Emese Nagy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.18
Cameron Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Sophie Dimoff
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.04
Krysta Szeto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Erica Dempsey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Anitra Sopronyi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.94
Loretta Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Sanjana Chintalapudi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Sarah Plagenza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emese Nagy + Emily Markwell17563% games+4.9% vs expected
Sanjana Chintalapudi + Loretta Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Plagenza + Cameron Passmore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Stemerman
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
4.39
4.5
Emily Markwell
94W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Emese Nagy
205W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Cameron Passmore
82W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
4.18
Sophie Dimoff
71W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
Krysta Szeto
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Erica Dempsey
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Anitra Sopronyi
38W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Loretta Chang
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Sanjana Chintalapudi
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Sarah Plagenza
77W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.