Teams

SS-LGT ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-22vs BVP REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesKate Strecker / Lindsey Markley vs Loretta Chang / Sanjana Chintalapudi7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPerri Anderson vs Sophie Dimoff6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristin Danford / Avery Tilney vs Emese Nagy / Emily Markwell5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Tripp vs Anitra Sopronyi7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Cameron Passmore / Sarah Plagenza7-6, 7-6
2026-05-19vs KC-RH PURPLEWon 32
L#1 DoublesRachel Frisz / Kate Strecker vs Megan Melucci / Leigh Hardin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPerri Anderson vs Grace Koza7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJenny Phelps / Kaitlyn Bridgers vs Mikaela Potter / Margaret Lamb6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAvery Tilney vs Laura Kannaka1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Kristin Danford vs Karin Frenz / Lara Callas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-12vs LTC-M GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesKate Strecker / Jenny Phelps vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Manuela Dos Santos6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPerri Anderson vs McCall Board6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Taryn Fleming / Stephanie Skarwecki0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAubrey Zahuranec vs Maeve Kearney3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Frisz / Kristin Danford vs Michelle Wadas / Melissa Louie6-7, 5-7
2026-04-28vs KC-RH PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesAnne Quallick / Jordan Campbell vs Mikaela Potter / Sarah Chomko6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Tripp vs Grace Koza0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Frisz / Avery Tilney vs Meghan Geisler / Leigh Hardin4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAnatta Charoenkul vs Laura Kannaka6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJenny Phelps / Laura Montoya vs Shannon Kiebler / Karin Frenz7-6, 6-3
2026-04-21vs LTC-M GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesJordan Campbell / Anne Quallick vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Joy Herrin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPerri Anderson vs Toni Barnett6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Frisz / Kaitlyn Bridgers vs Taryn Fleming / Michelle Wadas1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAubrey Zahuranec vs Mary Brennan2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Montoya / Jenny Phelps vs Denise Belk / Elizabeth Alcorn6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-04-14vs BVP REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesJordan Campbell / Lindsey Markley vs Emese Nagy / Emily Markwell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Tripp vs Rachel Stemerman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Montoya / Kaitlyn Bridgers vs Erica Dempsey / Loretta Chang7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAubrey Zahuranec vs Anitra Sopronyi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Danford / Alisa Phelps vs Cameron Passmore / Krysta Szeto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GTC BLACK511539100
2MEA YELLOW4210818170
3SS-LGT ORANGE3310817131
4MLF GREEN1551328198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Anne Quallick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Kaitlyn Bridgers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Kate Strecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Dagmar Velez
published 4.5
4.22
Jenny Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Jordan Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Anatta Charoenkul
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
4.19
Laura Montoya
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Perri Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.15
Lauren Tripp
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.11
Kristin Danford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Rachel Frisz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Avery Tilney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Alisa Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Tara Sonenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Aubrey Zahuranec
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Lindsey Markley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Campbell + Anne Quallick12658% games+1.5% vs expected
Alisa Phelps + Tara Sonenstein2439% games−13.5% vs expected
Laura Montoya + Kaitlyn Bridgers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Quallick
55W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Kaitlyn Bridgers
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Kate Strecker
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Dagmar Velez
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jenny Phelps
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
Jordan Campbell
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Anatta Charoenkul
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
4.20
Laura Montoya
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Perri Anderson
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Lauren Tripp
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Kristin Danford
42W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Rachel Frisz
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Avery Tilney
38W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alisa Phelps
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Tara Sonenstein
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Aubrey Zahuranec
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Lindsey Markley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.