Teams

Harris - Lawn and Tennis

2025 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-24vs Hill-Highland Country ClubLost 02
L#2 DoublesEllen Harris / Lori Hercules vs Jennifer Hill / Jessica Kouba3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Beth Collom vs Serriah Ciccone / Molly Lewis4-6, 3-6
2025-07-19vs Martin - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Lori Hercules vs Lynn Goldhammer / Tammy Keller3-6, 1-6
2025-06-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Collom / Sandra Florell vs Ann-Marie Johnson / Sondra Montesi Yates6-7, 3-6
2025-06-19vs Osterman - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Andra Zarins vs Michele Santiago / Jen Barton4-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs Lee - CCNCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Beth Collom vs Meagan Lee / Catherine Robinette6-1, 6-0
2025-06-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth VonCannon / Sandra Florell vs Molly Lewis / Averi Brown1-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs Martin - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Andra Zarins vs Tammy Keller / Lynn Goldhammer5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
3.60
Sandra Wilkes
published
3.45
Mary Howard
published
3.42
Lisa Kirkwood
published
3.23
Amy Hastings
published 3.5
3.07
Kathy Taylor
published
2.79
Sandra Florell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Beth Collom
published 3
2.72
Lori Hercules
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Beth VonCannon
published 3
2.48
Andra Zarins
published 3
Kathy Maas
published
Shannon Hodous
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Florell + Lori Hercules3342% gamesnot enough data
Mary Howard + Lori Hercules3249% gamesnot enough data
Amy Hastings + Mary Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary-Russellan MacDonald
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Sandra Wilkes
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Mary Howard
50W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lisa Kirkwood
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amy Hastings
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Kathy Taylor
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
3
Sandra Florell
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Beth Collom
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Lori Hercules
20W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Beth VonCannon
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Andra Zarins
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kathy Maas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Hodous
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.