Teams

Hill-Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-24vs Harris - Lawn and TennisWon 10
W#3 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Molly Lewis vs Sandra Florell / Beth Collom6-4, 6-3
2025-07-17vs Lee - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Averi Brown vs Meagan Lee / Catherine Robinette6-3, 6-3
2025-06-26vs Martin - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Averi Brown vs Denise Bauer Frazier / Tammy Keller6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-21vs Davidson - Pinehurst ResortWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Edmonds / Andrea Tatman vs Nannette Goodwin / Laura Davidson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Osterman - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Tatman / Susan Edmonds vs Tanya Zoppi / Laura Cooper4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Andrea Tatman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Susan Edmonds
published
3.47
Jessica Kouba
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
Lindsay Sarff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Katherine Armstrong
published
3.29
Meredith Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.11
Averi Brown
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
3.06
Julia McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Eydie Hammaker
published
2.74
Serriah Ciccone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kristin McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Serriah Ciccone + Lindsay Sarff3348% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Tatman + Dawn Dixon134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Sarff + Meredith Weinstein314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Kouba + Serriah Ciccone123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Kouba + Meredith Weinstein213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Andrea Tatman303 matchesnot enough data
Julia McDonald + Lindsay Sarff213 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Dixon + Lindsay Sarff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Tatman
77W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Susan Edmonds
34W–30L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Jessica Kouba
56W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Lindsay Sarff
71W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Katherine Armstrong
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Meredith Weinstein
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dawn Dixon
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Averi Brown
58W–25L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Julia McDonald
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Eydie Hammaker
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Serriah Ciccone
49W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kristin McCarthy
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.