Teams

TOHS.Rider

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-15vs TOC.TriebertWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Button Hall6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Rebekah Schloemann6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesNancy Pack vs Megan Smith6-4, 7-5
2022-07-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Aigerim Aitakyn6-2, 6-0
2022-07-21vs PW.StegmanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Valerie Short6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Katie Baker7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-07-14vs MD.WilliamsWon 20
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Meg Williams6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Brinette Myers6-2, 6-0
2022-06-23vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Alison Rooks6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Smita Paranjape4-6, 4-6
2022-06-16vs PW.StegmanWon 10
W#2 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Renee Stegman6-2, 6-3
2022-06-09vs MD.WilliamsWon 30
W#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Marcy Points6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Meredith Kinkle6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Shari McCandlish7-5, 6-2
2022-06-02vs TOC.TriebertSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Megan Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Lauren Triebert3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.77
Jamie Middledorf
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Meghan Rider
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4
3.27
Kimberly Durland
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pack + Meghan Rider6260% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Pack + Anna Tomkins5081% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Jamie Middledorf
140W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Meghan Rider
342W–169L career · 7 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–190L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.