Teams

Team Hand/Henry//OKC

2022 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-07vs Norman55s//WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hooper / Ava Nesbitt vs Linda Bahan / Lisa Bajema6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Cook / Beth Henry vs Pam Olson / Maria Rocha4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Corken / Diane Pound vs Erin Barnhart / Sunkyoung So4-6, 6-7
2022-05-17vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Cromwell / Elizabeth Hooper vs Dona Zanotti / Kimerlee Conner2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Cook / Beth Henry vs Alice Dorris / Julie Reding7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarisa New / Ava Nesbitt vs Annette Woodall / Suzanne Smith6-2, 6-4
2022-05-10vs Senior Management//OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Allen / Ava Nesbitt vs Jan Tipton / Renee Pascale6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Pound / Marisa New vs Maria Trapp-Braly / Rochelle Hale6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobin Murray / Kathy Corken vs MacHelle Wright / Melinda Parsons2-6, 2-6
2022-05-03vs Norman55s//WWWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Allen / Elizabeth Hooper vs Linda Bahan / Lisa Bajema4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Henry / Cindy Cook vs DIANA CLAYTON / Kayla Shavers6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSonya Easley / Ava Nesbitt vs Diane Cline / Maria Rocha6-4, 6-4
2022-04-26vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Cromwell / Ava Nesbitt vs Kimerlee Conner / Dona Zanotti2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJANET HAND / Diane Pound vs Ann Bonadeo / Suzanne Smith2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Corken / Marisa New vs Annette Woodall / Susie Hurst2-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs Senior Management//OKCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJANET HAND / Kathy Corken vs Jan Tipton / Renee Pascale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Cook / Beth Henry vs Rochelle Hale / Tammy Rainey6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Murray / Sonya Easley vs Debbie Geist / Carole ONeal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-12vs Norman55s//WWWon 21
L#1 DoublesSonya Easley / Elizabeth Hooper vs Linda Bahan / Lisa Bajema5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Corken / Diane Pound vs DIANA CLAYTON / Erin Barnhart6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Henry / JANET HAND vs Maria Rocha / Kayla Shavers6-4, 6-3
2022-04-05vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Allen / Marisa New vs Carey Freeman / Alice Dorris6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Corken / Robin Murray vs Annette Woodall / Susie Hurst3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJANET HAND / Beth Henry vs Kimerlee Conner / Dona Zanotti1-6, 1-6
2022-03-29vs Senior Management//OKCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Allen / Marisa New vs Laila Pfau / Tammy Rainey7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hooper / Ava Nesbitt vs Renee Pascale / Melinda Parsons2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Henry / Diane Pound vs Maria Trapp-Braly / Rochelle Hale6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ava Nesbitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Marisa New
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Elizabeth Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Beth Henry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Kathy Corken
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Robin Murray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Cook
published 3.5
JANET HAND
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Diane Pound
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Diane Cromwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sonya Easley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ava Nesbitt + Marisa New31266% games+9.5% vs expected
Robin Murray + Elizabeth Hooper4255% games+2.1% vs expected
Beth Henry + JANET HAND23756% games+1.1% vs expected
Marisa New + Diane Pound7451% games+0.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Hooper + Janet Allen5354% games−2.8% vs expected
Robin Murray + Kathy Corken253946% games−5.0% vs expected
Ava Nesbitt + Elizabeth Hooper6459% games−6.1% vs expected
JANET HAND + Diane Pound3444% games−13.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ava Nesbitt
61W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Marisa New
143W–98L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Elizabeth Hooper
35W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Beth Henry
88W–51L career · 12 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Kathy Corken
46W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Robin Murray
48W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Cook
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
JANET HAND
54W–37L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Pound
78W–94L career · 9 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Diane Cromwell
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Allen
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonya Easley
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.