Teams

Norman55s//WW

2022 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-07vs Team Hand/Henry//OKCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Bahan / Lisa Bajema vs Elizabeth Hooper / Ava Nesbitt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPam Olson / Maria Rocha vs Cindy Cook / Beth Henry6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Barnhart / Sunkyoung So vs Kathy Corken / Diane Pound6-4, 7-6
2022-05-31vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensLost 03
L#1 DoublesDIANA CLAYTON / Linda Bahan vs Ann Bonadeo / Alice Dorris4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPam Olson / Maria Rocha vs Teresa Simpson / Rhonda Lincoln2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Diane Cline vs Carey Freeman / Kim Rengstorf3-6, 1-6
2022-05-17vs Senior Management//OKCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Bahan / Jennifer Wilson vs Jan Tipton / MacHelle Wright6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Bajema / Erin Barnhart vs Melinda Parsons / Maria Trapp-Braly3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Cline / Leslie Mills vs Rochelle Hale / Tammy Rainey6-7, 4-6
2022-05-10vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Bahan / Lisa Bajema vs Rhonda Lincoln / Kim Rengstorf6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaria Rocha / Sunkyoung So vs Susie Hurst / Kimerlee Conner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSaundra Cobbs / Erin Barnhart vs Ann Bonadeo / Alice Dorris2-6, 4-6
2022-05-03vs Team Hand/Henry//OKCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Bahan / Lisa Bajema vs Janet Allen / Elizabeth Hooper6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDIANA CLAYTON / Kayla Shavers vs Beth Henry / Cindy Cook2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDiane Cline / Maria Rocha vs Sonya Easley / Ava Nesbitt4-6, 4-6
2022-04-26vs Senior Management//OKCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Rocha / Pam Olson vs Melinda Parsons / MacHelle Wright4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Bahan / Jennifer Wilson vs Laila Pfau / Maria Trapp-Braly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Cline / Leslie Mills vs Debbie Geist / Carole ONeal1-6, 6-7
2022-04-12vs Team Hand/Henry//OKCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Bahan / Lisa Bajema vs Sonya Easley / Elizabeth Hooper7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDIANA CLAYTON / Erin Barnhart vs Kathy Corken / Diane Pound3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Rocha / Kayla Shavers vs Beth Henry / JANET HAND4-6, 3-6
2022-04-05vs Senior Management//OKCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Olson / DIANA CLAYTON vs Carole ONeal / Debbie Geist4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Mills / Diane Cline vs Tammy Rainey / MacHelle Wright5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesErin Barnhart / Jennifer Wilson vs Laila Pfau / Maria Trapp-Braly0-6, 6-7
2022-03-29vs OKC: Prince-Freeman/GreensLost 03
L#1 DoublesSaundra Cobbs / Maria Rocha vs Dona Zanotti / Kimerlee Conner4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Bahan / Lisa Bajema vs Suzanne Smith / Ann Bonadeo0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Mills / Kayla Shavers vs Carey Freeman / Kim Rengstorf0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Maria Rocha
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Linda Bahan
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.51
Sunkyoung So
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Lisa Bajema
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Erin Barnhart
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
DIANA CLAYTON
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Leslie Mills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.00
Diane Cline
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Kayla Shavers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Saundra Cobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Bahan + Lisa Bajema573753% games+0.1% vs expected
Leslie Mills + Diane Cline242251% games−4.6% vs expected
Lisa Bajema + Erin Barnhart123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Olson + Maria Rocha033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Rocha
64W–45L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Linda Bahan
152W–94L career · 11 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sunkyoung So
99W–129L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Lisa Bajema
69W–53L career · 9 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Erin Barnhart
30W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
DIANA CLAYTON
16W–27L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Mills
55W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Diane Cline
57W–50L career · 9 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Kayla Shavers
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Olson
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Saundra Cobbs
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.