Teams

Cheval Kings - J. Knierman

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Men · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-11vs TYCC - J. FeeneyWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Roig vs Richard Forsyth6-1, 6-4
2021-12-04vs Hunters Green Bucks - M. BittingLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Roig / John Most vs Michael Bitting / Gregory Morrissey1-6, 0-6
2021-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesSundar Srinivasan / Andrew Roig vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Matt Denaro / Lionel PIN3-6, 3-6
2021-10-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Roig vs Andy Huang5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-02vs Palma Ceia - J. EckermannWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Roig vs Damian Laber6-1, 6-2
2021-09-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Roig / Sundar Srinivasan vs Brian Sheehan / Anthony Weiss6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Andrew Roig
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.87
Felipe Martinez
published 4
3.85
Amer Aldeen
published 4
3.75
Peter Marsocci
published
3.64
Todd Abrams
published
Douglas Sommerfield
published 3.5
Jason Crow
published
Michael Dayton
published
Sundar Srinivasan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Marsocci + Todd Abrams224 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Roig + Amer Aldeen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Roig
57W–48L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Felipe Martinez
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Amer Aldeen
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Todd Abrams
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Douglas Sommerfield
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Dayton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sundar Srinivasan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.